Market pace is now ridiculously fast, with hot topics taking turns to dominate. The lifeline of a project may only last a few weeks or even days. Everyone is watching for the "next trend," but few stop to ask: besides hype and speculation, what else does this have? It was only after stepping through countless pitfalls that I truly changed my perspective on cryptocurrencies.
Taking privacy-focused projects as an example, what attracts me is never the price increase but whether their positioning is sufficiently pragmatic. Privacy itself is not a new concept, but most projects either go to extremes with anonymous routes that attract regulatory crackdown or are left with only slogans. The real challenge in this space is: how to find a balance between privacy protection and compliant regulation?
The real financial system will never operate as a black box. Institutions need audits, regulators require verifiability, companies need transparency disclosures, but ordinary users also don’t want every transaction to be visible to the world. This contradiction leads some projects to ignore it, while others try to find a middle ground. The latter may not seem glamorous or generate short-term hot topics, but they have more reasons to survive.
Gradually, I no longer believe in the "get-rich-quick myth," but instead care about the necessity of a project’s existence. True value isn’t about climbing the hot list but whether it survives through real application rather than storytelling. These projects may not give you quick wealth dreams, but at least they are worth serious consideration.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
defi_detective
· 01-20 05:51
Reality is reality, but I've seen too many pragmatic projects die a slow death simply because no one promoted them... The privacy track is especially heartbreaking.
But on the other hand, projects like these are actually more likely to benefit from later-stage dividends, with lower risk and better sleep at night.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 01-20 05:50
After falling into so many pitfalls, I started focusing on the fundamentals rather than the price increase. Those who are thinking about quick flips should have woken up long ago.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlock
· 01-20 05:43
Gradually realizing that I still need to find projects that are stable and reliable, otherwise I'll be cut off sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 01-20 05:38
Only after hitting a wall did I realize that what truly matters is never the surge in value at a single moment
Projects in the privacy track that try to find a balance are indeed not sexy, but the ones that last the longest are often those
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 01-20 05:36
Haha, another article titled "I Finally Had an Epiphany." This paper hand was educated this way.
That's right, right now it's just a game of hot potato, and who gets the "flower" depends entirely on luck. I've also looked at the privacy track projects, and most of them are just a combination of hype and regulatory risks.
The key is to find those who are actually doing the work, not just bragging. But honestly, the growth of such projects is indeed visibly slow.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-20 05:29
Damn, this is my blood, sweat, and tears over the past two years. I've fallen into too many pits. Now, when evaluating projects, I think in reverse—skip those with stories but no real application.
Market pace is now ridiculously fast, with hot topics taking turns to dominate. The lifeline of a project may only last a few weeks or even days. Everyone is watching for the "next trend," but few stop to ask: besides hype and speculation, what else does this have? It was only after stepping through countless pitfalls that I truly changed my perspective on cryptocurrencies.
Taking privacy-focused projects as an example, what attracts me is never the price increase but whether their positioning is sufficiently pragmatic. Privacy itself is not a new concept, but most projects either go to extremes with anonymous routes that attract regulatory crackdown or are left with only slogans. The real challenge in this space is: how to find a balance between privacy protection and compliant regulation?
The real financial system will never operate as a black box. Institutions need audits, regulators require verifiability, companies need transparency disclosures, but ordinary users also don’t want every transaction to be visible to the world. This contradiction leads some projects to ignore it, while others try to find a middle ground. The latter may not seem glamorous or generate short-term hot topics, but they have more reasons to survive.
Gradually, I no longer believe in the "get-rich-quick myth," but instead care about the necessity of a project’s existence. True value isn’t about climbing the hot list but whether it survives through real application rather than storytelling. These projects may not give you quick wealth dreams, but at least they are worth serious consideration.