Here's an interesting comparison of financial data.
Berkshire Hathaway versus the S&P 500 performance:
Looking back 20 years, Berkshire increased by 735.8%, while the S&P 500 was 437.9%—a clear advantage.
Over 15 years, the gap begins to narrow: Berkshire at 525.7% versus the S&P 500 at 454.4%, still leading but the margin has decreased.
Looking at the recent 10-year, 5-year, and 3-year data, it's quite revealing. Over 10 years, Berkshire gained 288.8%, slightly surpassing the S&P 500's 267.5%. In the 5-year period, Berkshire at 117.5% versus the S&P 500 at 91.7%, still holding up.
But in the last 3 years? Berkshire at 58.4% was directly beaten down by the S&P 500's 79.1%.
This reflects an interesting phenomenon: the longer the time horizon, the more apparent Berkshire's relative advantage becomes; the shorter the period, especially in recent years, the more the market index has performed vigorously. The battle between long-term stock-picking ability versus short-term market volatility is worth pondering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LeverageAddict
· 01-20 05:52
Wow Buffett, what's going on? Beaten by the market for three years. Is this still the same stock god?
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 01-20 05:52
Just like mile 20 in a marathon, buffett's hitting that wall where the young guns on steroids (looking at you, mega caps) sprint past. But zoom out to the finish line—20 years still tells the real story. Short-term noise vs accumulation phase, classic market cycles playing out.
Reply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-20 05:39
Even Buffett can't resist the AI wave. What does that mean? In the short term, it's just a gambler's game.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 01-20 05:32
Buffett has indeed been a bit underperforming in recent years. When the AI wave arrived, the market directly taught him a lesson.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 01-20 05:31
This data is a bit heartbreaking, has Buffett been out of the game these past few years?
---
Long-term it’s definitely bullish, but in the last three years, it’s been a beating. Is this magical or inevitable...
---
Basically, the old man can’t keep up with this round of frenzy; stock picking is no match for betting on the market.
---
So here’s the question: should we trust long-term ability or follow the short-term hype?
---
Interestingly, everyone knows that long-term compound interest is awesome, but when the market surges, nobody can sit still haha.
---
Berkshire Hathaway has been crushed in the past three years, now index fund fans are excited.
---
The further back you look, the more you see the value of stock picking; the closer you look, the more it seems like gambling. That’s just how the market is now.
---
I really don’t understand why every big market rally is dominated by index funds over individual stocks.
Here's an interesting comparison of financial data.
Berkshire Hathaway versus the S&P 500 performance:
Looking back 20 years, Berkshire increased by 735.8%, while the S&P 500 was 437.9%—a clear advantage.
Over 15 years, the gap begins to narrow: Berkshire at 525.7% versus the S&P 500 at 454.4%, still leading but the margin has decreased.
Looking at the recent 10-year, 5-year, and 3-year data, it's quite revealing. Over 10 years, Berkshire gained 288.8%, slightly surpassing the S&P 500's 267.5%. In the 5-year period, Berkshire at 117.5% versus the S&P 500 at 91.7%, still holding up.
But in the last 3 years? Berkshire at 58.4% was directly beaten down by the S&P 500's 79.1%.
This reflects an interesting phenomenon: the longer the time horizon, the more apparent Berkshire's relative advantage becomes; the shorter the period, especially in recent years, the more the market index has performed vigorously. The battle between long-term stock-picking ability versus short-term market volatility is worth pondering.