2026-01-20 05:22:42

When it comes to technical choices, it's always a trade-off: wanting powerful smart contracts means sacrificing privacy, and wanting privacy protection means having to give up complex logic. The Dusk project directly breaks this curse, allowing you to have both.

Honestly, during development, it was quite a dilemma. Complex business logic must run on public chains like Ethereum, and for privacy, solutions like Zcash are only suitable for simple transfers. Dusk's core technological breakthrough is the realization of truly confidential smart contracts—that's the key.

You can deploy super complex financial models on-chain. For example, automated options hedging strategies, dark pool matching logic—underlying parameters, trigger conditions, and fund flows are all tightly protected by zero-knowledge proofs. The code can run secretly under everyone's watch, and this capability is truly enticing for giants in high-frequency trading—who would want to turn their profit-making strategies into open-source code that can be copied by the entire network?

This is why projects like this can attract institutional funds that genuinely want to go on-chain. Not only does it plug technical vulnerabilities, but more importantly, it solves real business dilemmas.

DUSK2,61%

ETH-4,66%

ZEC-6,26%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HappyToBeDumped

· 1h ago

You want both fish and bear paws, this is what Web3 should look like --- Zero-knowledge proof safeguards confidential contracts, now institutional big players really have a reason to go on-chain --- In simple terms, it's privacy plus intelligence. The previous either-or approach was too torturous --- Can dark pool logic run confidentially? This is indeed a necessity for large funds, no wonder it can attract institutions --- Eating fish and bear paws together, developers finally don't have to tear between privacy and functionality --- The key is keeping the code confidential while still being able to verify, this is the correct way to open up --- Why don't institutional funds go on-chain? Still worried about their strategies being stolen and learned, Dusk has now solved this pain point --- Using zero-knowledge proofs like this truly combines privacy and complex logic effectively --- No need to choose one or the other, finally a project has thought of this issue

View OriginalReply0

0xLuckbox

· 8h ago

You want both fish and bear paws, now you finally don't have to be forced to choose. Dusk's approach is truly brilliant. Institutions have been waiting for this. Only with privacy and complex logic can they innovate. Zero-knowledge proofs directly lock in the strategy. Anyone who dares to copy your code is blind. Exactly, this is the real money-maker, not just bragging. Can privacy and performance coexist? I need to study this tech stack.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 8h ago

Wow, this is a real technological breakthrough. Finally, someone has unraveled this deadlock. Zero-knowledge proof protects trading strategies, and institutional veterans can now sleep peacefully without worrying about their arbitrage models being exposed. It used to be really awkward; privacy and complexity were always a trade-off. Now, Dusk's approach is truly excellent. Dark pool logic running secretly on-chain—how many high-frequency trading teams are dreaming of this? Institutional money is made this way. Things with commercial value will never lack backers.

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator

· 8h ago

This is really awesome. Zero-knowledge proofs are directly applied to smart contracts, allowing you to have both fish and bear paws. Yeah, it's true. The high-frequency trading folks have wanted this for a long time. No matter how awesome the strategy is, there's no need to worry about reverse engineering. Wait, could this become a secret weapon for institutions? Retail investors still can't play with it. It's unprecedented. The long-standing dilemma of privacy versus complexity has finally been solved. In simple terms, it allows your code to be both powerful and confidential. For institutions, this is truly a game-changer.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 8h ago

Bro, this is what I call identifying the pain points. Privacy and complex logic have always been at odds. Institutional funds have been waiting for this; strategies that don't want to be copied finally have a place to go. If zero-knowledge proofs can truly be stably implemented, this will be a game-changer. Speaking of which, Zcash was too simple back then and couldn't support any valuable business. On the profit logic, going on-chain and being transparent to everyone—what's the point? Dusk has thought of this angle perfectly. But whether it can be truly deployed in practice remains to be seen. Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 8h ago

Alright, alright, finally someone has broken this deadlock. I’ve been saying why privacy and complex logic must lead to a dead end. The biggest concern for real large funds is actually that their strategies might be exposed and copied. Dusk’s approach really hits the pain point. Running financial logic with zero-knowledge proofs? It sounds crazy, but it might actually be feasible. We need to take a close look at the technical architecture. Institutional funds have never cared most about the technology itself, but whether it can help them hide and make money. Now I understand why it’s gaining popularity. If it truly becomes stable, those big players hiding in dark pools will be over the moon.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 9h ago

Wow, this is a real breakthrough. Privacy + complex logic all in one go. Institutional investors are definitely waiting for this. Hey, to put it simply, the big investors can finally keep their secret profit formulas hidden, no more worries about copying strategies. The zero-knowledge proof system is indeed hardcore. Running options hedging on-chain while keeping it confidential? This is what Web3 should look like. But on the other hand, if such privacy contracts become widespread, what about regulation? It’s a temporary thrill. The true demand from institutional capital is now clear — they want both fish and bear paws. Wait, if transaction logic can truly be executed privately, how do we prevent black market scenarios? It feels like a double-edged sword. No wonder it can attract institutions. Who wouldn’t want to keep their algorithms hidden? It all depends on whether it can truly be implemented. The technology is very sexy, but ultimately, it depends on who can scale first. That’s how the competition will be decided. This is competitiveness — needing both the complexity of smart contracts and privacy protection. Dusk has found its window.

View OriginalReply0