Recently, I delved into the technical progress of the Dusk project, and there are some points worth discussing.
To be honest, now many blockchain projects love to boast, writing roadmaps as if they were novels, but what’s the result? Most of them are just talk on paper. But Dusk is different. Their development progress is tangible, with clear timelines for each stage from testnet to mainnet, and their technical indicators are transparent. I’ve reviewed the latest development reports, and the testing of core functionalities is basically complete.
What’s even more impressive is that the team isn’t overwhelmed by pressure. They maintain a clear attitude—solidify the technology first, then go live. In this environment driven by quick gains, this approach is indeed rare. Sharding technology, privacy contracts, and other features are steadily iterating, and their focus on user experience is also evident.
The privacy project track is now highly competitive, with everyone racing to develop faster. However, few projects truly establish a solid technical foundation. Dusk’s methodical, step-by-step strategy should demonstrate its competitiveness in the upcoming cycle. I’m very eager to see the mainnet go live officially, and I’m curious whether more Dusk-based applications and ecosystems will emerge.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOSapien
· 18h ago
Really, now seeing Dusk's calm and unhurried attitude is actually a bit rare. Most projects are just performing arts, but Dusk is quietly working hard. I like this spirit.
If Dusk can truly succeed in the privacy track and build a solid ecosystem, it will be really interesting. But this track is very competitive, so it all depends on who can stick it out until the end.
Honestly, no matter how fancy the technology stack is, it's useless if it doesn't have practical application. At least Dusk isn't bragging about being the best in the world.
I have some expectations that a few privacy projects will survive when the mainnet launches.
I'm just worried it will be another case of "steady progress" ending in a dead end. Hopefully, Dusk can break the curse.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 18h ago
Honestly, Dusk's technical roadmap doesn't boast as much as other projects; it still seems to have some substance.
Dusk's steady and reliable approach is indeed rare in this impatient circle, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on its performance after the mainnet launch.
In such a competitive privacy track, besides solid technical fundamentals, the ecosystem must also keep up; otherwise, it's all for nothing.
I'm a bit curious about how their sharding solution specifically addresses scalability issues. Recently, I saw a development report that didn't seem to detail things enough.
Before the mainnet launch, whether Dusk can develop its application ecosystem is the key to determining victory or defeat.
To put it simply, reliable technology is just the basics; now it's about who can build the ecosystem.
Looking forward to the day Dusk's mainnet launches. If it truly delivers the expected performance, this will be the opportunity to get in.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetective
· 18h ago
Well, finally there's a project that isn't bragging every day. I respect Dusk's pace.
Honestly, compared to those whose roadmaps are revised over and over again, I prefer this kind of low-key technical work.
Let's wait for the mainnet launch and see what innovations the ecosystem can bring.
But in such a competitive privacy track, can they really survive until the end...
Dusk's attitude is pretty good; they haven't been pushed too crazy by capital.
If this round fails, I'll just laugh—another "paper tiger."
There's still some time before the mainnet launch, don't rush, let's see how it goes.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKaren
· 18h ago
Oops, Dusk really put in the effort this time, unlike some projects that just keep hyping without substance.
Wait, is this team really not rushing to meet deadlines? That's interesting.
The privacy track is so competitive, it's really rare to find a team that can focus on developing technology.
The mainnet is live, I need to follow up, maybe the ecosystem can grow.
This is the right attitude, much more comfortable than those frantic projects.
Recently, I delved into the technical progress of the Dusk project, and there are some points worth discussing.
To be honest, now many blockchain projects love to boast, writing roadmaps as if they were novels, but what’s the result? Most of them are just talk on paper. But Dusk is different. Their development progress is tangible, with clear timelines for each stage from testnet to mainnet, and their technical indicators are transparent. I’ve reviewed the latest development reports, and the testing of core functionalities is basically complete.
What’s even more impressive is that the team isn’t overwhelmed by pressure. They maintain a clear attitude—solidify the technology first, then go live. In this environment driven by quick gains, this approach is indeed rare. Sharding technology, privacy contracts, and other features are steadily iterating, and their focus on user experience is also evident.
The privacy project track is now highly competitive, with everyone racing to develop faster. However, few projects truly establish a solid technical foundation. Dusk’s methodical, step-by-step strategy should demonstrate its competitiveness in the upcoming cycle. I’m very eager to see the mainnet go live officially, and I’m curious whether more Dusk-based applications and ecosystems will emerge.