#Strategy加仓BTC Regulatory Game Intensifies: Leading Compliance Platform CEO Pushes for Stablecoin Legislation at Davos
The Davos Forum on January 20th has become the "regulatory showcase" for the crypto market. Executives from a top compliance platform engaged in intensive discussions with global banking CEOs, with a clear goal — to promote the enactment of a structural crypto legislation in the United States and to secure a "legal status" for stablecoins.
The focus of this behind-the-scenes meeting centered on a core issue: Can stablecoins become a fair competition tool between crypto companies and traditional financial institutions? Based on current developments, major industry players have already begun to take proactive steps, aiming to clarify the status and profit rules of stablecoins within the legislative framework.
Interestingly, this platform previously opposed the clause in the legislation that "prohibits interest income from stablecoins," and withdrew support. Now, they are back at the negotiation table, reflecting a flexible strategic adjustment that demonstrates the crypto industry's pragmatic attitude toward regulation — first identifying red lines, then fighting for the maximum benefit space.
At the same time, discussions are also underway regarding the application prospects of tokenization in capital markets, attempting to bring the story of crypto finance to more traditional financial decision-makers. This Davos trip essentially symbolizes the crypto industry's transition from the fringe to the mainstream stage. Whether the regulatory environment can truly be optimized depends on how policymakers respond.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpBeforeRug
· 01-20 05:40
It's the same old story again, first saying they won't say more, really quite savvy.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistaker
· 01-20 05:39
Basically, it's the big fish bouncing back and forth at the negotiation table—first saying no, then saying yes. The routine is quite familiar...
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxAddict
· 01-20 05:38
Really typical, first saying no and then no again. This move is just testing the regulatory bottom line.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 01-20 05:27
It's the same old trick again—first say no, then when the wind shifts, come back to negotiate.
#Strategy加仓BTC Regulatory Game Intensifies: Leading Compliance Platform CEO Pushes for Stablecoin Legislation at Davos
The Davos Forum on January 20th has become the "regulatory showcase" for the crypto market. Executives from a top compliance platform engaged in intensive discussions with global banking CEOs, with a clear goal — to promote the enactment of a structural crypto legislation in the United States and to secure a "legal status" for stablecoins.
The focus of this behind-the-scenes meeting centered on a core issue: Can stablecoins become a fair competition tool between crypto companies and traditional financial institutions? Based on current developments, major industry players have already begun to take proactive steps, aiming to clarify the status and profit rules of stablecoins within the legislative framework.
Interestingly, this platform previously opposed the clause in the legislation that "prohibits interest income from stablecoins," and withdrew support. Now, they are back at the negotiation table, reflecting a flexible strategic adjustment that demonstrates the crypto industry's pragmatic attitude toward regulation — first identifying red lines, then fighting for the maximum benefit space.
At the same time, discussions are also underway regarding the application prospects of tokenization in capital markets, attempting to bring the story of crypto finance to more traditional financial decision-makers. This Davos trip essentially symbolizes the crypto industry's transition from the fringe to the mainstream stage. Whether the regulatory environment can truly be optimized depends on how policymakers respond.