Web3 hotspots emerge one after another, but projects that can sustain long-term attention often share a common point—the mechanism and real-world applications form a self-reinforcing cycle. Walrus's performance over the past year is worth observing.
Let's look at the data first. By the end of 2025, the average monthly burn of WAL has reached around 120,000 tokens, a roughly 50% increase from the beginning of the year. This is not a routine buyback and burn operation, but stems from genuine ecosystem interactions. Every storage transaction, data synchronization, and application deployment automatically triggers burning, with the burn rate also linked to ecosystem activity. The data for the fourth quarter is even more interesting—peak monthly burn reached 150,000 tokens, occurring during the gradual implementation of AI storage, RWA rights confirmation, and cross-border data compliance scenarios. Based on this growth rate, doubling the burn volume in Q1 next year is not just a fantasy.
Actions from the institutional side are also noteworthy. Holdings of some leading institutions have increased month-over-month, including strategic entries from top venture capital firms. In terms of ecosystem applications, over a hundred projects are already running on Walrus. Recently, the mainnet V2 upgrade introduced a "burn mining" mechanism, where user participation in ecosystem contributions can earn additional burn rewards, further reducing circulating supply.
The brilliance of this mechanism lies in the fact that burning is no longer passive consumption but directly tied to business volume. The more active the ecosystem, the more burning occurs; the more burning, the greater the scarcity. Once this cycle gets running, the project's fundamentals are continuously supported. The airdrop window is not far off, and whether it's worth paying attention to depends on whether this logic can continue to evolve.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmi
· 01-20 05:00
The logic of destroying mining is indeed ruthless; destruction driven by real business is more convincing than buybacks.
Institutions are increasing their holdings, and over a hundred ecosystem projects are running. This pace doesn't seem like empty talk.
Q1 doubling the destruction volume? If it can truly continue like this, the circulating supply pressure will indeed gradually diminish.
Let's see if they can maintain this wave of enthusiasm later; don't want it to become just a fleeting project again.
Let's wait for the airdrop to discuss further. Anyway, just mark this logic first.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 01-20 04:52
Destruction data looks good, but ultimately, this self-reinforcing cycle depends on how long the ecosystem's genuine activity can sustain itself.
As the airdrop window approaches, it's often the most exciting part of the story.
According to database statistics, the actual usage rates of over a hundred projects after launch will be quite interesting.
Let's wait patiently for the bloom, or rather, wait for the next delay notification.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 01-20 04:38
Destroy hook actual business volume, this design is indeed fierce
Real destruction data stacking with institutional bottom-fishing, quite interesting
But it depends on whether it can hold up, this set of logic in Web3 projects has been played out too many times
Hundreds of projects running on it, circulating supply is still shrinking... a bit risky
During the night before the airdrop, caution is needed
Wait, the destruction volume doubles? This growth rate is truly outrageous
Just looking at the data alone makes it hard to judge, the key is whether application landing can keep up
Is it really that simple for institutions to enter? It depends on how much real money they are willing to invest
The key to solving the "cyclical disease" of Web3 might really have been found by Walrus
In simple terms, it’s about automating consumption, the creativity is indeed impressive
Web3 hotspots emerge one after another, but projects that can sustain long-term attention often share a common point—the mechanism and real-world applications form a self-reinforcing cycle. Walrus's performance over the past year is worth observing.
Let's look at the data first. By the end of 2025, the average monthly burn of WAL has reached around 120,000 tokens, a roughly 50% increase from the beginning of the year. This is not a routine buyback and burn operation, but stems from genuine ecosystem interactions. Every storage transaction, data synchronization, and application deployment automatically triggers burning, with the burn rate also linked to ecosystem activity. The data for the fourth quarter is even more interesting—peak monthly burn reached 150,000 tokens, occurring during the gradual implementation of AI storage, RWA rights confirmation, and cross-border data compliance scenarios. Based on this growth rate, doubling the burn volume in Q1 next year is not just a fantasy.
Actions from the institutional side are also noteworthy. Holdings of some leading institutions have increased month-over-month, including strategic entries from top venture capital firms. In terms of ecosystem applications, over a hundred projects are already running on Walrus. Recently, the mainnet V2 upgrade introduced a "burn mining" mechanism, where user participation in ecosystem contributions can earn additional burn rewards, further reducing circulating supply.
The brilliance of this mechanism lies in the fact that burning is no longer passive consumption but directly tied to business volume. The more active the ecosystem, the more burning occurs; the more burning, the greater the scarcity. Once this cycle gets running, the project's fundamentals are continuously supported. The airdrop window is not far off, and whether it's worth paying attention to depends on whether this logic can continue to evolve.