A veteran from the early PayPal days recently reflected on Elon Musk's insight about system integrity: implementing robust anti-fraud measures inevitably triggers the loudest pushback from those operating schemes in the shadows. When you tighten controls against fraudulent activity and grifting, the people most vocal in their complaints are precisely those whose operations would be exposed. It's a useful lens for understanding resistance to security upgrades in financial systems—genuine users rarely object to stronger protections, but bad actors? They'll make their voices heard immediately.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseHomeless
· 01-21 00:48
Hey, that's why those caught red-handed are shouting the loudest. The clown is exposing himself.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 01-20 19:48
There's nothing wrong with that statement. The more aggressively they investigate fraud projects, the more loudly those guys shout.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-20 05:02
It sounds like those scammers are the ones who love to shout the most. Genuine users actually don't mind a few more verification steps...
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 01-20 04:56
The more I investigate, the more nervous I get, indicating that someone is indeed up to something.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDay
· 01-20 04:46
There's nothing wrong with what you said; the more someone tries to hide something, the louder they yell.
A veteran from the early PayPal days recently reflected on Elon Musk's insight about system integrity: implementing robust anti-fraud measures inevitably triggers the loudest pushback from those operating schemes in the shadows. When you tighten controls against fraudulent activity and grifting, the people most vocal in their complaints are precisely those whose operations would be exposed. It's a useful lens for understanding resistance to security upgrades in financial systems—genuine users rarely object to stronger protections, but bad actors? They'll make their voices heard immediately.