WAL has indeed attracted quite a bit of attention recently. This project’s use of a dual burn mechanism to reduce circulating supply is quite interesting; from the perspective of supply and demand imbalance, it could potentially unlock some value. Plus, it has already obtained authoritative compliance certifications, and institutions are heavily invested, indicating that traditional capital has a high level of recognition for it.



Currently, the project is in the final stage of airdrop distribution, and participants can really gain tangible benefits—staking yields, node sharing, all laid out clearly. Technologically, Walrus has real skills in data privacy and modular blockchain liquidity aggregation, which are exactly the pain points Web3 urgently needs to solve. Although market performance has been volatile, the project’s technical foundation and real-world commercial scenarios are there, and in the long run, it still has momentum.

Regarding trading opportunities with BTC, the technical outlook looks interesting—

📊 The current price is at 0.1396 USDT
🟢 Support level is at 0.1378, very close, so consider positioning for a long
🔴 Resistance is at 0.1421, not far away, watch out for risks

The entry idea is straightforward: place buy orders near the support level, and if it breaks below support, stop loss and exit—don’t get entangled. For small-scale support and resistance operations like this, disciplined execution is key.
WAL-5,97%
BTC-3,7%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ApeEscapeArtistvip
· 17h ago
The double destruction and supply compression move is indeed fierce; once supply and demand reverse, there's potential. The key is whether institutions are really investing real money, which is the most convincing.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNutvip
· 17h ago
The double destruction and supply suppression tactic is indeed ruthless, but it still depends on whether institutions will actually step in to buy the dip. There are too many projects with impressive on-paper data.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorervip
· 17h ago
The double destruction to lower supply is indeed a clever trick, but heavy institutional holdings might not be affected—depends on when they decide to sell off.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Arbitrageurvip
· 17h ago
lol dual burn mechanism is just supply-side cope if liquidity mechanics are still broken... have they actually optimized the gas consumption on their bridge transactions? running the numbers here and the slippage windows look suboptimal ngl
Reply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 17h ago
The dual destruction and compressed supply logic sounds good, but what really matters is that institutions are heavily holding. This indicates where the money is flowing. I've been watching the support levels, but with the current market noise, it's better to wait for a clearer breakout signal for more stability.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApevip
· 17h ago
I'm a bit skeptical about the dual destruction mechanism. Just reducing supply isn't enough; it depends on whether real demand can keep up, otherwise it's just a castle in the air.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancakevip
· 17h ago
The dual destruction mechanism sounds promising, but these days, there are too many projects promising to reduce circulation through commitments. Few can actually deliver.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)