The no-code movement is real—anyone can spin up a protocol now, launch a token, or build the next big thing without touching a single line of code. Tools are everywhere. Yet here's the catch: technical barriers fell, but good ideas didn't multiply. If anything, the entry made it easier to build mediocre stuff at scale. The harsh truth nobody wants to admit? Most projects today are execution problems masking idea poverty.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagabond
· 11h ago
That hits too close to home. No-code tools are great, but they have indeed become a mass production line for trash projects.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 11h ago
ngl the real marathon started when tools got too accessible. now we're just watching sprinters get gassed at mile 3, thinking they ran the whole race lol
Reply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 11h ago
Well said, having more tools actually leads to more being used as mere fillers.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 11h ago
Ideas are bankrupt, tools are flooded, this is Web3 now.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 11h ago
In simple terms, low barriers to entry lead to an influx of trash projects. No matter how many tools people use to cobble things together without ideas, it's all pointless.
The no-code movement is real—anyone can spin up a protocol now, launch a token, or build the next big thing without touching a single line of code. Tools are everywhere. Yet here's the catch: technical barriers fell, but good ideas didn't multiply. If anything, the entry made it easier to build mediocre stuff at scale. The harsh truth nobody wants to admit? Most projects today are execution problems masking idea poverty.