Many people have a misconception about stablecoin payments: they think that transferring USDT from one chain to another and wrapping it with a wallet app is all it takes. Only after experiencing the pitfalls do they realize that issues like dried-up liquidity, high user costs, and slow transaction confirmations have crushed most projects.
There is an alternative approach: instead of patching things up, design a new public chain architecture optimized specifically for the stablecoin ecosystem from scratch. The result is what you see now—a truly mature stablecoin economy is taking shape.
Scale data best illustrates the issue. This chain has become the second-largest on-chain lending market globally, with the highest stablecoin lending-to-supply ratio among all Aave V3 deployments. A single lending pool's liquidity depth reaches around $200 million, meaning large amounts of stablecoins can be borrowed with low slippage.
Upper-layer applications are also catching up. Some DEXs have implemented token swaps with zero gas fees and MEV protection—on other chains, such features are either prohibitively expensive or simply impossible. International payment institutions and mechanism providers are gradually integrating, using this chain as a reliable settlement layer.
Technologically, this solution combines execution layers with consensus mechanisms—developers can deploy quickly with zero learning curve, consensus is achieved in sub-second times, and the overall design philosophy is: prioritize stablecoins first and treat them not as "additional application layer tokens."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBrownies
· 6h ago
Wow, finally someone has figured out stablecoins. It's not something you can patch together from here and there.
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 01-20 04:55
Someone finally explained this clearly. The previous bunch of cross-chain stablecoin solutions were really just pie in the sky... Once liquidity dries up, it's game over.
Optimizing the architecture layer for stablecoins is indeed a brilliant idea.
The data is impressive; Aave's lending volume is truly powerful.
I need to try a zero-gas-fee DEX; the transaction fees on other chains are ridiculously high.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 01-20 04:52
This is the right way. Those previous cross-chain solutions were really just robbing Peter to pay Paul.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 01-20 04:40
This idea is indeed brilliant. Finally, someone is treating stablecoins as the main character rather than a supporting role.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 01-20 04:40
Oh, finally someone explained the pitfalls of stablecoin payments clearly. Most projects indeed fail at these three points.
Zero gas fees plus MEV protection? Sounds good, but it depends on how the actual user experience turns out.
I agree with the idea of designing the blockchain architecture from scratch; it's much better than just copying existing chains.
Where does the data that Aave V3's supply and borrow rates are the highest come from? Need to check.
Two hundred million USD in liquidity sounds significant, but what can we say about it in the context of the entire market?
This architecture design logic is indeed clear. Treat stablecoins as first-class citizens rather than add-ons; the approach is correct.
International payment institutions are gradually integrating? I want to see more details on this; don’t let it be just marketing again.
Sub-second consensus speed, zero learning curve for developers—just worried that it sounds great but might perform only okay in practice.
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlocker
· 01-20 04:33
This is the right way. Those previous cross-chain wrapping was really just closing one's ears to steal a bell.
Finally, someone is taking stablecoins seriously, not just as an accessory.
I need to try zero gas fee; other chains have already given up long ago.
Many people have a misconception about stablecoin payments: they think that transferring USDT from one chain to another and wrapping it with a wallet app is all it takes. Only after experiencing the pitfalls do they realize that issues like dried-up liquidity, high user costs, and slow transaction confirmations have crushed most projects.
There is an alternative approach: instead of patching things up, design a new public chain architecture optimized specifically for the stablecoin ecosystem from scratch. The result is what you see now—a truly mature stablecoin economy is taking shape.
Scale data best illustrates the issue. This chain has become the second-largest on-chain lending market globally, with the highest stablecoin lending-to-supply ratio among all Aave V3 deployments. A single lending pool's liquidity depth reaches around $200 million, meaning large amounts of stablecoins can be borrowed with low slippage.
Upper-layer applications are also catching up. Some DEXs have implemented token swaps with zero gas fees and MEV protection—on other chains, such features are either prohibitively expensive or simply impossible. International payment institutions and mechanism providers are gradually integrating, using this chain as a reliable settlement layer.
Technologically, this solution combines execution layers with consensus mechanisms—developers can deploy quickly with zero learning curve, consensus is achieved in sub-second times, and the overall design philosophy is: prioritize stablecoins first and treat them not as "additional application layer tokens."