In the world of privacy coins, there's always an unavoidable dilemma: if you want absolute anonymity like Monero, you have to accept snail-paced confirmation speeds; if you want lightning-fast transactions, privacy protection has to be compromised. It's like the classic dilemma of choosing between fish and bear paws.
Until DUSK emerged, attempting to solve both problems simultaneously with ZK-Rollup technology. Interestingly, they didn't opt to directly use existing open-source solutions; instead, they started from scratch and built their own. This "self-developed" approach may seem labor-intensive and unappealing, but in reality, it has created a deep technological moat.
To put it plainly, other projects are merely patching existing frameworks, while DUSK is laying its own foundation, designing everything independently, and building a complete system from the ground up. Data from the official testnet speaks volumes—peak TPS surpassing 2000+, a record that truly leads in the privacy chain sector. Competitors still struggling to break triple digits in TPS look somewhat overwhelmed in comparison.
The real core competitiveness lies in the ability to "weld" high-speed processing with strong privacy protection. This isn't just a simple feature stacking but a deep integration at the technical level. For ordinary users, the most tangible experience boils down to three words: fast, private, affordable. This directly addresses the biggest pain point for large-scale privacy applications—the user experience issue.
Of course, self-development comes with costs—high development expenses and longer iteration cycles. But from another perspective, having absolute control over the entire tech stack grants DUSK a valuable strategic advantage. While competitors are still integrating and fine-tuning general solutions, DUSK is already defining the next-generation performance standards for privacy chains. In this tech-innovation-driven race, such first-mover advantage and architectural originality are assets that are hardest for others to imitate.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicator
· 9h ago
Self-developed technology is indeed impressive, but who will bear the cost? In the end, it will just impact the coin price. Over 2000+ TPS sounds great, but wait until the mainnet launches and the price drops even more.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 10h ago
Our self-developed system is indeed aggressive, but it only counts once the 2000+ TPS data is truly launched.
What’s the use of beautiful data on the testnet every day...
Wait, isn’t DUSK just another PPT chain?
In the privacy coin space, everyone claims to be the fastest and most private. Ultimately, it still depends on whether the ecosystem can take off.
Many projects are working on ZK-Rollup; why should DUSK be able to win outright?
Others can just modify existing solutions, but they boast about self-development... feels a bit over the top.
This kind of architecture autonomy still puts a lot of pressure on cold start.
Fast speed, strong privacy, low cost—can all three be truly achieved? I have some doubts.
High development costs and long iteration periods... whether spending so much money can be recouped is still uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBad
· 10h ago
Self-developed technology means spending money. Does DUSK dare to play this hand?
Wait, can 2000+ TPS really run stably? Why is the testnet data so impressive?
Privacy + speed + low cost—if all three are truly achieved, that would be incredible.
Monero still needs to be confirmed gradually; DUSK taking off immediately? I'm a bit skeptical.
Developing a proprietary moat sounds good, but it depends on whether it can truly withstand competition.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 10h ago
Self-developed technology is indeed challenging, but that's the barrier. Others patch and fix, DUSK directly rewrites the game rules.
Privacy + speed has always been a false proposition, but now someone dares to get serious.
Breaking 2000 TPS is not a lie; the number is right there. Competitors might really be feeling anxious.
To be honest, self-development carries high risks, but controlling the entire stack is worth it. In the long run, DUSK's technical accumulation will become increasingly solid.
Fast, private, cheap—these three words hit the dead end of privacy coins. Don't get fancy; users are just into this.
This wave feels a bit like Monero back in the day, although the technical routes are different, but the serious attitude is the same.
In the world of privacy coins, there's always an unavoidable dilemma: if you want absolute anonymity like Monero, you have to accept snail-paced confirmation speeds; if you want lightning-fast transactions, privacy protection has to be compromised. It's like the classic dilemma of choosing between fish and bear paws.
Until DUSK emerged, attempting to solve both problems simultaneously with ZK-Rollup technology. Interestingly, they didn't opt to directly use existing open-source solutions; instead, they started from scratch and built their own. This "self-developed" approach may seem labor-intensive and unappealing, but in reality, it has created a deep technological moat.
To put it plainly, other projects are merely patching existing frameworks, while DUSK is laying its own foundation, designing everything independently, and building a complete system from the ground up. Data from the official testnet speaks volumes—peak TPS surpassing 2000+, a record that truly leads in the privacy chain sector. Competitors still struggling to break triple digits in TPS look somewhat overwhelmed in comparison.
The real core competitiveness lies in the ability to "weld" high-speed processing with strong privacy protection. This isn't just a simple feature stacking but a deep integration at the technical level. For ordinary users, the most tangible experience boils down to three words: fast, private, affordable. This directly addresses the biggest pain point for large-scale privacy applications—the user experience issue.
Of course, self-development comes with costs—high development expenses and longer iteration cycles. But from another perspective, having absolute control over the entire tech stack grants DUSK a valuable strategic advantage. While competitors are still integrating and fine-tuning general solutions, DUSK is already defining the next-generation performance standards for privacy chains. In this tech-innovation-driven race, such first-mover advantage and architectural originality are assets that are hardest for others to imitate.