The most common pitfall for AI project developers: when encountering subpar model performance, the first reaction is to blame the algorithm or the model itself. But those who have truly experienced this know that the problem often lies elsewhere.
A careful look at the current Web3 technology stack makes this clear. Data sources are scattered and chaotic, with various protocols and dApps operating independently, and there is no unified data standard. Even more frustrating, signals that have already been generated are hard to reuse, requiring reprocessing every time, which is extremely inefficient.
This is the fundamental reason why many AI applications perform only moderately on-chain. Intelligent agents need to reason based on the same set of facts, but the current infrastructure simply cannot support this.
The key breakthrough lies at the data layer. If behavioral data can be standardized, allowing various intelligent agents, dApps, and protocols to operate based on the same data baseline, everything will change — iteration speeds will increase, execution logic will become clearer, and the system will truly become scalable. This is not a minor optimization; it’s a game-changer.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 17h ago
The typical "scapegoat model" phenomenon, the blame for the unfinished on-chain infrastructure is thrown at AI [laughs and cry]. As for data standardization, it sounds simple but in practice, protocols need to stop working independently first, which is more difficult than fixing smart contract vulnerabilities.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 17h ago
It sounds good, but standardization is always a joke in Web3. Each operates independently, which is the norm. Who is willing to make the first concession?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 17h ago
Wow, there's nothing wrong with standardizing data. The chaos of each chain acting independently on-chain has long needed to be addressed.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 17h ago
Data standardization is really a thing now; the on-chain environment is indeed a complete mess.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 17h ago
The data layer is indeed a pain point, but it's easier said than done. Who will actually do the standardization?
The most common pitfall for AI project developers: when encountering subpar model performance, the first reaction is to blame the algorithm or the model itself. But those who have truly experienced this know that the problem often lies elsewhere.
A careful look at the current Web3 technology stack makes this clear. Data sources are scattered and chaotic, with various protocols and dApps operating independently, and there is no unified data standard. Even more frustrating, signals that have already been generated are hard to reuse, requiring reprocessing every time, which is extremely inefficient.
This is the fundamental reason why many AI applications perform only moderately on-chain. Intelligent agents need to reason based on the same set of facts, but the current infrastructure simply cannot support this.
The key breakthrough lies at the data layer. If behavioral data can be standardized, allowing various intelligent agents, dApps, and protocols to operate based on the same data baseline, everything will change — iteration speeds will increase, execution logic will become clearer, and the system will truly become scalable. This is not a minor optimization; it’s a game-changer.