Walrus as a decentralized storage protocol in the Sui ecosystem initially gained its competitiveness through Sui's Move contracts and high TPS. But now, as the ecosystem enters a new stage, focusing solely on a single blockchain is no longer enough; cross-chain storage capabilities are becoming the next key point.



From a technical feasibility perspective, implementing cross-chain storage with Walrus is not as complicated as it might seem. The main issues to address are: how to build the cross-chain bridge, how to adapt data formats, and how to ensure compatibility of consensus mechanisms across different chains.

First, regarding the cross-chain bridge. Walrus's approach is to develop a dedicated cross-chain bridging solution based on the Chainlink CCIP protocol, connecting major public chains like Ethereum and Solana. It sounds ambitious, but the core mechanism is not complex—using Hash Time Lock Contracts (HTLC) to ensure the atomicity of cross-chain data transfer, thereby preventing data loss or tampering during transit. Additionally, the bridging layer must also adapt to RedStuff-encoded sliced data, allowing both main slices and sub-slices to synchronize across chains, solving the longstanding problem of incompatible data formats among different public chains.

Next, on the optimization of the encoding layer. Although RedStuff encoding is currently closely tied to Sui's Move contracts, the core XOR operations and slicing storage logic are essentially chain-agnostic. The technical team’s approach is to strip out the Sui-specific parts of the encoding and create a universal encoding interface, enabling RedStuff encoding to run in different virtual machine environments like EVM and Solana VM. This broadens the path for cross-chain storage.
WAL-4,12%
SUI-3,59%
ETH-6,16%
SOL-4,84%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 11h ago
Cross-chain storage? Sounds good, but can Walrus really pull this off? I'm a bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTellervip
· 11h ago
Cross-chain storage is indeed the next breakthrough, but to be honest, it still depends on execution. Whether Walrus can truly decouple RedStuff encoding is the key.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollectorvip
· 11h ago
Cross-chain storage and positioning have been discussed for a long time. How many of these ideas have actually been implemented? Walrus's approach sounds decent, but is the HTLC mechanism really reliable?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 11h ago
The term "cross-chain storage capability positioning" is quite good, but can Walrus truly ensure HTLC atomicity guarantees? It seems like there are significant risks in this area.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 11h ago
honestly the "redstuff encoding is chain-agnostic" copium hits different... saw this exact narrative in 2021 with cosmos, let's examine the actual contract first
Reply0
TestnetFreeloadervip
· 12h ago
Cross-chain storage is indeed a breakthrough, but can Walrus really deliver on its promises? Chainlink CCIP sounds reliable, but I'm worried it might turn out to be another abandoned project.
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 12h ago
It's another cross-chain storage; it seems every project is talking about this logic. Can Walrus really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)