If you want to truly understand the privacy track, you will see an unavoidable issue: institutions simply won't touch completely anonymous systems.



Dusk's approach here is particularly worth noting. They didn't follow the traditional privacy protocol path but instead developed an auditable privacy execution layer—Hedger. How does it work? Zero-knowledge proofs combined with homomorphic encryption, enabling transactions to run with default privacy but still be verifiable and auditable when needed. The design logic is clear: it’s meant to enable regulatory compliance, not to help bypass regulations.

The core idea is simple: regulation won't disappear out of thin air, and institutions won't use a black-box system. Most projects choose to avoid this issue, but Dusk directly addresses it head-on. Few in the entire Web3 space do this.

When RWA (Real-World Assets) truly gains momentum, privacy won't be a question of "whether" but rather "how to do it compliantly." From this perspective, Hedger is not just an optional module; it is the lifeblood of Dusk's long-term competitiveness. The value of $DUSK will ultimately be closely tied to this capability.
DUSK-9,28%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Rugman_Walkingvip
· 11h ago
To be honest, I respect this logic. Most privacy projects are really just playing hide and seek with regulations, but the idea behind Dusk directly tackles it. An auditable privacy execution layer may sound contradictory, but it is indeed a requirement at the institutional level. Once RWA gains momentum, privacy becomes an essential topic, and this timing is very well understood.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 11h ago
Wake up, most privacy projects are just gambling on regulators sleeping, but Dusk's approach is more realistic. --- Auditable privacy sounds a bit contradictory, but it's indeed the only way for institutions to foot the bill. --- Honestly, projects that can satisfy both privacy and compliance are few and far between. Dusk dares to do this, which shows it has some real substance. --- Black box systems? Ha, institutional legal teams would never sign off on that. Dusk has figured this out. --- With RWA taking off, privacy is now a necessity. Most projects are still in self-deception. --- Hedger's logic is brilliant—protects privacy while enabling auditing. That's truly thinking for institutions. --- Complete anonymity should have died long ago. Instead of hiding from regulation, it's better to dance with it. Dusk has figured this out. --- Other privacy projects shout about freedom every day, but none are used by institutions. That's a lesson learned.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinTherapistvip
· 11h ago
To be honest, this approach is indeed clear-headed and much smarter than those projects that stubbornly stick to pure anonymity. Institutional finance requires auditing the chain, and Dusk's verifiable privacy logic hits the pain point. Hedger, if truly implemented well, can indeed change the game rules. But the key still depends on whether it can be genuinely accepted by traditional finance; having a plan alone is not enough. Once RWA is up and running, privacy compliance will definitely become competitive, and having the first-mover advantage is significant.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrainvip
· 12h ago
To be honest, Dusk's recent move has truly hit the pain points of the privacy sector.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)