2026-01-20 04:26:13

Seeing DUSK's recent correction, many people have started to doubt. But if you remember how it skyrocketed from 0.06 to 0.33, you'll understand what this wave of adjustment signifies.

Short-term price fluctuations are actually the market's self-healing process. Every shakeout is accumulating energy for the next surge. As a privacy-focused and compliant RWA public chain, DUSK's technological foundation and market positioning remain unchanged, and its core competitiveness still exists.

In the real-world asset tokenization sector, we all know its scale—the trillion-dollar opportunity is right there. DUSK's first-mover advantage and compliance in this field have already attracted the attention of many traditional financial institutions. This recognition isn't built overnight, nor will it disappear because of short-term price fluctuations.

How to view the current situation? A few perspectives are worth considering: corrections in a bear market are often the best entry points; don't let short-term noise from K-line charts disrupt your rhythm. True gains come from long-term holding and trend awareness.

Since you've chosen to participate in this sector, it's better to stay patient and see how far DUSK can go.

DUSK-6,28%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletWhisperer

· 8h ago

yeah the retrace is just whale clustering redistributing... 0.06 to 0.33 print doesn't erase with a little pullback, that's rookie thinking tbh. RWA infrastructure doesn't care about your weekly candles ngl.

Reply0

NFTregretter

· 11h ago

A bear market shakeout is like this: scaring away a group of people, leaving true believers. DUSK's recent correction is very normal.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 11h ago

By the way, 0.06 to 0.33 didn't increase for nothing. This current correction is actually just a shakeout; stay calm.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropworkerZhang

· 11h ago

It's just a shakeout; I've experienced 0.06 to 0.33 already. This little fluctuation isn't a big deal. If you're timid, just sell. I'll hold until the end of the year anyway. The RWA track has a substantial size, and DUSK's compliance advantage won't change in the short term. The harder the drop, the greater the opportunity. Don't be scared off by panic selling. This kind of correction was long overdue. The market needs self-repair. Keep buying.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 11h ago

0.06 to 0.33 didn't run at all, now you're scared? --- Honestly, the RWA sector is really different, traditional finance is watching closely --- Market manipulation, every time it's said to be manipulation, when will it truly rise? --- Compliance is indeed valuable, unlike those shady projects --- The theory of picking up bargains in a bear market is tired, if you don't have cash, don't just talk nonsense --- Long-term holding? Bro, I've already laid flat, eat when you can, sleep when you can --- Hearing about trillion-level tracks sounds great, but the question is how to ensure DUSK can get a piece of that cake --- Falling from a high position really tests your mentality, but as long as the fundamentals aren't bad, there's no need to rush --- How many times have I said that the technical foundation hasn't changed? The real indicator is still the candlestick chart --- Whether traditional financial institutions' attention is reliable depends on whether they really invest real money

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 11h ago

Another storytelling moment, everyone has heard the story from 0.06 to 0.33 It's just a shakeout; no one dares to move on RWA.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 11h ago

Fell back from 0.06 to 0.33 again. I was a bit hesitant this time, but I still made quite a profit. The current price feels like a good entry point.

View OriginalReply0