In the current landscape of ongoing Web3 market segmentation, projects with genuine token burn mechanisms and regulatory endorsements are standing out. Take Walrus as an example; its deflationary design is indeed worth noting.



The two core points of the project are: first, the burn rate is accelerating. Monthly burn volume exceeds 180,000 tokens, and the dual mechanisms of transaction and application consumption continuously compress circulating supply, which has fallen below 30 million tokens. With supply frozen on the supply side, any growth in demand can leverage the price. Second, the progress in compliance is tangible. SEC Reg A+ certification has been obtained, meaning the project has gained recognition within the US regulatory framework. The heavy involvement of traditional institutions like Fidelity and Grayscale indicates that traditional capital has confidence in its compliant status.

From a trading perspective, over 60 mainstream exchanges have listed WALUSDT trading pairs, fiat on/off ramps are established, and 50x leverage contracts are also available, ensuring liquidity and trading flexibility are not issues. The recent airdrop mechanism is also quite interesting—participation with zero gas fees and low entry barriers, staking with an annualized yield of 42% plus 5% burn dividends, and node deployment sharing 90% of protocol fees—this multi-layered revenue model can indeed attract many participants.

Of course, every project carries risks, but based on data and progress, the window of opportunity for strategic deployment at this stage is indeed narrowing. Missing this cycle’s deflationary leader may mean waiting a long time for the next comparable project.
WAL-1,65%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
EntryPositionAnalystvip
· 9h ago
180,000 tokens destroyed per month sounds impressive, but the real question is how long the liquidity can last. It's not surprising that 60 exchanges list it; the key still depends on the holding structure—large holders haven't locked in.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 10h ago
No hype, no negativity. The destruction process is indeed more serious than most projects. Wait, did Fidelity and Grayscale really hold large positions? Or are they just storytelling again? I've heard the compliance licenses so many times, but in the end, anything can happen. 50x leverage... No, this thing is just a harvesting tool. Wake up. Where did the data that circulating supply fell below 30 million come from? Did you calculate it yourself? But on the other hand, there are really not many projects that have actually destroyed tokens. Can't deny that. 42% annualized? Uh, with such a high return, you need to be careful, brother. This is a classic case of "looks perfect but full of pitfalls in the details." SEC certification + participation from traditional institutions—this combination does have some weight. Wait, has anyone gone in? Can it really be withdrawn?
View OriginalReply0
SundayDegenvip
· 10h ago
Wow, the destruction speed is so fast, the circulating supply has broken 30 million? Now the supply side is truly locked down.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaservip
· 10h ago
Damn, the speed of destruction is really unsustainable. The circulating supply dropping below 30 million is definitely a leverage point.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)