Recently, the points project has been launched, and overall, the wear rate is indeed quite noticeable. The experience of the previous batch of low-protection accounts was pretty good, but after canceling the referral points, the revenue difference became apparent.
According to the data, an account with a 10,000 transaction volume earns about 1500 GP in points income. After switching to the current standard account, the same transaction volume results in a significantly higher wear rate. Compared to the previous revenue model, this wave has indeed been less profitable, mainly due to the lack of continuous trading motivation—after all, with a small volume, the wear cost becomes relatively more prominent.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PaperHandsCriminal
· 16h ago
Here we go again, cutting leeks. What can I exchange 1500 GP for? It’ll be gone after some wear and tear.
I knew it was going to be bad the moment they canceled the recommendation points, and sure enough.
Small size is the original sin, everyone. For us retail investors, it’s really tough.
Does the wear rate have anything to do with IQ? Why is it getting more and more ridiculous?
Oh my God, is this all a standard account can do? It’s even worse than the previous basic account.
This sentence really hit me: "You’ve saved a lot by not刷." Who still has the motivation...
Another new trick to exploit羊毛. This time, I’ve really been taken down.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodger
· 17h ago
The wear rate is so intense, feeling like 1500GP was directly cut in half, it's a bit uncomfortable.
---
After canceling the recommendation points, it’s a complete shutdown. This revision really hurts.
---
Small accounts can’t afford to play anymore; the costs are just too high.
---
1 million in transaction volume only yields 1500GP? It was a bit sweet before, but now it’s all gone.
---
Lack of motivation, no rewards—who would still play here? Truly.
---
This wear and tear mode can really discourage people, honestly.
---
Small scale really gets repeatedly exploited; no wonder no one is playing anymore.
---
Once the recommendation points are canceled, the true nature is immediately revealed, full of tricks.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 17h ago
Such a high wear rate? It's obvious this wave isn't going to work out. Recommend cutting the points directly to GG.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 17h ago
Such a high wear rate? I suspected they changed the algorithm a long time ago, and now there's finally data to confirm it.
Recently, the points project has been launched, and overall, the wear rate is indeed quite noticeable. The experience of the previous batch of low-protection accounts was pretty good, but after canceling the referral points, the revenue difference became apparent.
According to the data, an account with a 10,000 transaction volume earns about 1500 GP in points income. After switching to the current standard account, the same transaction volume results in a significantly higher wear rate. Compared to the previous revenue model, this wave has indeed been less profitable, mainly due to the lack of continuous trading motivation—after all, with a small volume, the wear cost becomes relatively more prominent.