Recently, the deflationary logic of Walrus has been interesting to observe. The average monthly destruction of WAL has exceeded 120,000 tokens, a 50% increase compared to the beginning of the year. This is not just simple buyback and burn, but driven by real business scenarios.
The key lies in its sources of destruction—every storage transaction, data interaction, and application deployment triggers destruction, with the destruction ratio dynamically adjusting according to ecosystem activity. In Q4 2025, the peak monthly destruction reached 150,000 tokens, supported by high-frequency applications such as AI storage, RWA rights confirmation, and cross-border data compliance gradually being implemented.
Data shows that institutional deployment is accelerating. A leading trust holding increased its holdings by 30% month-over-month, and a well-known venture capital firm has also entered strategically. What does this indicate? Mainly, a positive outlook on the actual application progress of the ecosystem. Currently, over a hundred applications are connected to the ecosystem, forming a complete chain from storage and data to application.
There are also new developments in technological upgrades. After the mainnet V2, a new "Destruction Mining" mechanism was added, allowing users to participate in ecosystem contribution and directly earn rewards. This effectively combines destruction and incentives. Based on current growth rates, destruction in Q1 could double, making the deflationary effect more pronounced.
This model is indeed more solid compared to relying solely on buybacks. Real demand drives destruction, applications expand, and the ecosystem self-reinforces—this logical chain is tightly closed. The application deployment in 2026 will be a key point to watch.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForumLurker
· 9h ago
The design of destroying mining is a bit harsh, combining deflation with incentives.
Wait, can Q1 really double? That would require a huge amount of usage...
Institutions' sniffing for bottom-fishing is still sharp; following RWA definitely has potential.
Basically, it all depends on whether there is real trading volume to support it, otherwise it's just another air coin scheme.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 9h ago
Real-world scenario-driven destruction, this is true hard currency, unlike some projects that only talk but don't act.
Institutional 30% position increase is not without reason; a self-sustaining ecosystem can support the market.
The destruction mining design is brilliant, reversing inflationary pressure.
Over a hundred applications connected? Not bad, at least it's not just a paper prosperity.
If Q1 doubles in destruction, the scarcity of WAL will really increase.
But we still have to wait until 2026 to see the real results; any current optimistic talk is just expectations.
This logical chain is much more reliable than Sei's approach.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayer
· 10h ago
Real-world application drives destruction; this logic is indeed much more solid than air projects.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 10h ago
Real business scenarios drive destruction, this is the true way
The destruction mining mechanism has some substance, combining incentives with deflation
Institutions are entering the market, indicating confidence in real application implementation
Wait, is the Q1 destruction doubling true? How to verify the data?
Over a hundred applications have been integrated, and there is a closed-loop logic, but it depends on execution capability
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBot
· 10h ago
It seems that real-world scenarios are driving destruction, not just pure financial tricks. This logic is quite solid.
---
Institutions increasing their holdings by 30% indicate that major players are also betting on the application landing, not just hype.
---
The concept of destruction mining is indeed fresh, combining deflation with incentives. Users are motivated to participate, and only then can the ecosystem truly take off.
---
Having over a hundred applications connected sounds good, but I'm worried about the hype. How many of them actually have stable business flows?
---
Q1 destruction doubling? If this pace continues, there is definitely potential for next year.
---
Compared to projects that hype buybacks every day, at least Walrus has real transactions supporting the destruction volume. The difference is quite clear.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJack
· 10h ago
honestly the burn-to-earn mechanics here are actually™ non-trivial, but let's be real—without formal verification on those dynamic adjustment parameters, this could crater faster than you'd expect
Recently, the deflationary logic of Walrus has been interesting to observe. The average monthly destruction of WAL has exceeded 120,000 tokens, a 50% increase compared to the beginning of the year. This is not just simple buyback and burn, but driven by real business scenarios.
The key lies in its sources of destruction—every storage transaction, data interaction, and application deployment triggers destruction, with the destruction ratio dynamically adjusting according to ecosystem activity. In Q4 2025, the peak monthly destruction reached 150,000 tokens, supported by high-frequency applications such as AI storage, RWA rights confirmation, and cross-border data compliance gradually being implemented.
Data shows that institutional deployment is accelerating. A leading trust holding increased its holdings by 30% month-over-month, and a well-known venture capital firm has also entered strategically. What does this indicate? Mainly, a positive outlook on the actual application progress of the ecosystem. Currently, over a hundred applications are connected to the ecosystem, forming a complete chain from storage and data to application.
There are also new developments in technological upgrades. After the mainnet V2, a new "Destruction Mining" mechanism was added, allowing users to participate in ecosystem contribution and directly earn rewards. This effectively combines destruction and incentives. Based on current growth rates, destruction in Q1 could double, making the deflationary effect more pronounced.
This model is indeed more solid compared to relying solely on buybacks. Real demand drives destruction, applications expand, and the ecosystem self-reinforces—this logical chain is tightly closed. The application deployment in 2026 will be a key point to watch.