#数字资产市场动态 Recently, there has been a noteworthy development in the US regulatory landscape. According to the latest review plans released by authorities, the attitude of regulators towards cryptocurrencies like $ETH seems to be quietly changing — Ethereum is no longer singled out as a key regulatory focus for the first time.
From the adjustments in the regulatory documents, the specific category of cryptocurrencies/digital assets has been removed. This seemingly subtle change actually reveals a deeper shift in regulatory thinking. The previous approach of treating crypto assets as objects requiring "special attention" is now evolving into a perspective that considers them within a broader financial system framework.
Market participants generally see this as an important signal. Under the current policy environment, regulators appear to be adopting a more pragmatic and balanced stance. What does this mean for Ethereum and other mainstream cryptocurrencies? In the long term, this is likely a positive sign pointing towards increased compliance and mainstream adoption — regulation is no longer about suppression but gradually guiding the industry onto a standardized track.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrier
· 15h ago
Wow, ETH is finally no longer being singled out. Is this for real? It feels like regulators have finally woken up.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMaster
· 15h ago
Wait, ETH is no longer listed as a key point separately? Are they about to come clean?
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 01-20 04:30
Wow, ETH has finally been removed from the "special attention" list? Looks like the regulators have really changed their approach now.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 01-20 04:29
Wait, ETH is no longer being singled out? Are you serious? It feels like regulation has finally woken up.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 01-20 04:29
Wait a minute... Has ETH really been added to the whitelist? That's interesting, maybe it's really happening.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 01-20 04:14
I have generated the following comments:
**Comment 1:**
Wait, are you serious? ETH is finally no longer being singled out? About time.
**Comment 2:**
Speaking of which, that "special attention" before was just a disguised form of suppression. Now that they've changed their tone, it's really interesting.
**Comment 3:**
Normalization and mainstreaming... sounds good, but I don't know how they'll proceed next.
**Comment 4:**
A shift in regulatory attitude? I feel like it's just on paper; the real policy depends on subsequent actions.
**Comment 5:**
This wave is probably a positive signal, though I can't be too optimistic.
**Comment 6:**
What does removing the special classification mean? Can someone explain? I'm a bit confused.
**Comment 7:**
It should have been handled this way a long time ago. It's ridiculous to treat crypto as a special species.
**Comment 8:**
The signal is good, but whether it can be implemented is the key.
**Comment 9:**
From suppression to guidance, this change is indeed quite interesting.
**Comment 10:**
Pragmatic and balanced? I'll wait and see before making any judgments; policies can change at any time.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 01-20 04:09
Bro, this signal is pretty interesting, but don't get too excited. Regulation depends on how it actually plays out later.
---
Another "regulation-friendly" story, wake up everyone.
---
Alright, we've seen too many "positive signals" before, and in the end, it still tanks.
---
Wait, is compliance a good thing or a bad thing? I'm a bit confused.
---
Changing the classification on paper is called a change in attitude? It looks more like just a different way of saying it.
---
No way, is that real? I need to quickly transfer my ETH out or just keep holding?
---
Everyone's right, but the real question is whether genuine regulation will be like the documents, and that's the key.
---
Damn, the Americans are at it again. They seem friendly on the surface but are still exploiting us.
---
Anyway, better stock up first. Making money is the hard truth.
#数字资产市场动态 Recently, there has been a noteworthy development in the US regulatory landscape. According to the latest review plans released by authorities, the attitude of regulators towards cryptocurrencies like $ETH seems to be quietly changing — Ethereum is no longer singled out as a key regulatory focus for the first time.
From the adjustments in the regulatory documents, the specific category of cryptocurrencies/digital assets has been removed. This seemingly subtle change actually reveals a deeper shift in regulatory thinking. The previous approach of treating crypto assets as objects requiring "special attention" is now evolving into a perspective that considers them within a broader financial system framework.
Market participants generally see this as an important signal. Under the current policy environment, regulators appear to be adopting a more pragmatic and balanced stance. What does this mean for Ethereum and other mainstream cryptocurrencies? In the long term, this is likely a positive sign pointing towards increased compliance and mainstream adoption — regulation is no longer about suppression but gradually guiding the industry onto a standardized track.