When choosing Web3 projects, don't be fooled by concepts After working on several projects, I realize that whether it can be implemented is much more important than a good story.
How to identify reliable ones? My experience is to look at three points—
First is solid infrastructure. For example, is the stablecoin really solving the pain point of cross-border transfers? Projects like Plasma have made zero-fee transfers a necessity, directly lowering the participation cost for ordinary users. That’s the true moat.
Second is an ecosystem closed loop. Cross-chain interoperability isn’t just for the sake of cross-chain, but genuinely expands the liquidity boundary of assets. Users can seamlessly switch across multiple chains, and ecosystem benefits can be precisely realized, giving both beginners and veterans a chance.
The $XPL example is quite interesting—its design of binding ecosystem growth allows holders to directly enjoy the dividends of project expansion. No flashy marketing, just deep focus on essential needs.
Honestly, projects that focus on steady work are much more reliable than chasing hype concepts. The sector’s dividend is right there, the key is whether you have the patience to wait. Often, it’s not about not being able to find the right direction, but about not settling down to do long-term research.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSunnyDay
· 10h ago
That's so true. Nowadays, everyone is just storytelling, but those who truly implement are the real treasures.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 10h ago
Actually implementing things is much harder than just talking about them. How many projects have raised a bunch of money just by hyping concepts?
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLow
· 10h ago
That's true, everyone wants to double their investment quickly, but the reality is a mess of setbacks.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 10h ago
It's true, but how many can truly settle down and focus? Most still want to double their investment quickly.
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBounce
· 10h ago
They're all clichés; waiting for the price to drop before buying again is the real strategy. Those who talk about "moats" and "ecosystem closed loops" never say much when it's time to make money.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 11h ago
Grounded > The story, this sentence hit me. I've been scared off by too many scam coins.
January 20 Observation
When choosing Web3 projects, don't be fooled by concepts
After working on several projects, I realize that whether it can be implemented is much more important than a good story.
How to identify reliable ones? My experience is to look at three points—
First is solid infrastructure. For example, is the stablecoin really solving the pain point of cross-border transfers? Projects like Plasma have made zero-fee transfers a necessity, directly lowering the participation cost for ordinary users. That’s the true moat.
Second is an ecosystem closed loop. Cross-chain interoperability isn’t just for the sake of cross-chain, but genuinely expands the liquidity boundary of assets. Users can seamlessly switch across multiple chains, and ecosystem benefits can be precisely realized, giving both beginners and veterans a chance.
The $XPL example is quite interesting—its design of binding ecosystem growth allows holders to directly enjoy the dividends of project expansion. No flashy marketing, just deep focus on essential needs.
Honestly, projects that focus on steady work are much more reliable than chasing hype concepts. The sector’s dividend is right there, the key is whether you have the patience to wait. Often, it’s not about not being able to find the right direction, but about not settling down to do long-term research.