Why anonymous founders in crypto fundraising? Hard pass. Look, if you're out there raising capital publicly, the whole undoxxed founder thing just doesn't work for me—it's sketchy. Take Unwise for instance: the project name is literally Unwise, and nobody can verify who's actually behind it. That's the problem right there. How do you build real legitimacy when your team stays hidden? In the Web3 space, transparency isn't just nice to have—it's the foundation of trust. Investors need to know who they're backing. Community members need accountability. Without that, you're just another faceless entity asking people to throw money at an idea. Maybe some projects can pull it off, but for serious fundraising in this market? The anonymous route feels increasingly risky for both founders and investors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PoolJumper
· 2h ago
Anonymous funding? Nonsense, I'd rather go all in and get rugged.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 22h ago
Anonymous founders raising funds? Laughing out loud, this is just the prelude to rug pulling.
---
Oh my god, Unwise is so straightforward with its name, and still dares to raise funds anonymously, really clueless.
---
No one knows who you are, why should I invest my money? This logic simply doesn't add up.
---
Web3 is about transparency and decentralization, but you're hiding and causing trouble. Isn't that self-contradictory?
---
Where is the promised accountability? All hidden, yet you want us to blindly invest. No way.
---
There are plenty of projects that can show their faces publicly. I just pass on those trying to be mysterious. I really don't understand where they get the courage from.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 22h ago
Anonymous founder fundraising? Seriously, don't buy into this. It's too unreliable.
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 22h ago
Anonymous financing, in my opinion, is just nonsense. Spending money still depends on the person; otherwise, it's no different from gambling.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 23h ago
Anonymous founder fundraising? I directly pass, this trick is already tired.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collector
· 23h ago
ngl this is a big trap, anonymous financing really can't be played in this market anymore
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurker
· 23h ago
Anonymous financing? Ha, I don't believe you. Unwise is just called Unwise; who knows what the heck is behind it?
Why anonymous founders in crypto fundraising? Hard pass. Look, if you're out there raising capital publicly, the whole undoxxed founder thing just doesn't work for me—it's sketchy. Take Unwise for instance: the project name is literally Unwise, and nobody can verify who's actually behind it. That's the problem right there. How do you build real legitimacy when your team stays hidden? In the Web3 space, transparency isn't just nice to have—it's the foundation of trust. Investors need to know who they're backing. Community members need accountability. Without that, you're just another faceless entity asking people to throw money at an idea. Maybe some projects can pull it off, but for serious fundraising in this market? The anonymous route feels increasingly risky for both founders and investors.