MetaDAO's direction is fine, but there are still flaws in the mechanism design. The current model encourages farmers to use large amounts of capital to gamble for small allocation rights, and since TGE usually starts at a very low price...... this logic actually rewards short-term arbitrage rather than long-term participation. As a result, it attracts liquidity seekers chasing quick profits, raising concerns about the health of the ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatcher
· 12h ago
It's the same old trick of cutting leeks; I've seen through it long ago.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployer
· 12h ago
It's the same old trick again, gambling economics disguised as a DAO.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 12h ago
It's the same old trick again. Large amounts of funds betting on small distribution rights, I've seen through it from the on-chain footprints long ago—check how those early coin-holding addresses are doing now; just trace the transfer history, and it's clear that the fund migration never stops.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustler
· 13h ago
It's the same old trick of cutting leeks again. It's politely called an incentive mechanism, but in reality, it's just bait.
MetaDAO's direction is fine, but there are still flaws in the mechanism design. The current model encourages farmers to use large amounts of capital to gamble for small allocation rights, and since TGE usually starts at a very low price...... this logic actually rewards short-term arbitrage rather than long-term participation. As a result, it attracts liquidity seekers chasing quick profits, raising concerns about the health of the ecosystem.