A certain on-chain trader who previously made $14.26 million trading WBTC has recently placed a big bet on ETH. According to on-chain data tracking, this whale has been continuously accumulating Ethereum since 2026, currently holding 13,700 ETH with a total asset value of $43.91 million.
What’s more noteworthy is this trader’s latest move. Just 4 hours ago, he withdrew 1,000 ETH from Kraken in one go, then transferred all of it into the Aave platform as collateral for borrowing. What signals might this series of actions be sending?
In terms of cost basis, the average price of this ETH is around $3,205. But the current market conditions seem less friendly—at the current price, the account is already showing a unrealized loss of $216,000. For whales with hundreds of millions of dollars, this loss isn’t enough to cause serious damage, but it does reflect the market’s uncertainty.
Interestingly, this address’s past success with WBTC tells us that big players often have a market lead in their intuition. Why is he now putting ETH into a lending protocol as collateral? Is he optimistic about the future and looking to leverage long, or does he have other motives? These details may be worth pondering for market participants.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_guzzler
· 12h ago
I really can't hold back anymore. This guy is using 1000 ETH to collateralize on Aave. Is he really going for leverage or betting on a rebound in the market? He's holding a floating loss of 216,000 and continues to add positions—he's got some serious guts.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweeper
· 12h ago
What is this whale doing? Losing 216,000 and still daring to throw 1,000 ETH into Aave as collateral? I think it's a crazy gamble on the future market.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 12h ago
This guy lost 210,000 without blinking, staking 1,000 ETH on Aave... Is he really optimistic or just gambling on something?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodger
· 12h ago
Why is this whale so stubborn, insisting on leveraging long in Aave? If they get liquidated this time, it'll be hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 12h ago
It's the same old trick again—borrowing and collateralizing are just ways to leverage for a long position. What else can it be... The guy choosing to go all-in on ETH is indeed bold. With a cost basis of 3205 and now floating losses so high, he's still willing to add more. Truly a gambler's mindset.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 13h ago
This whale is already down 210,000 in unrealized losses but still adding leverage. Truly a man with a stronger gambling spirit, I admire it.
A certain on-chain trader who previously made $14.26 million trading WBTC has recently placed a big bet on ETH. According to on-chain data tracking, this whale has been continuously accumulating Ethereum since 2026, currently holding 13,700 ETH with a total asset value of $43.91 million.
What’s more noteworthy is this trader’s latest move. Just 4 hours ago, he withdrew 1,000 ETH from Kraken in one go, then transferred all of it into the Aave platform as collateral for borrowing. What signals might this series of actions be sending?
In terms of cost basis, the average price of this ETH is around $3,205. But the current market conditions seem less friendly—at the current price, the account is already showing a unrealized loss of $216,000. For whales with hundreds of millions of dollars, this loss isn’t enough to cause serious damage, but it does reflect the market’s uncertainty.
Interestingly, this address’s past success with WBTC tells us that big players often have a market lead in their intuition. Why is he now putting ETH into a lending protocol as collateral? Is he optimistic about the future and looking to leverage long, or does he have other motives? These details may be worth pondering for market participants.