2026-01-20 03:31:43

Regarding the UNI token economic model, there are many misconceptions and exaggerated claims in the market.

Some people multiply the protocol revenue of 1 billion and the 25% buyback ratio, claiming that the annual buyback scale is 1 billion multiplied by 25%, which equals 400 million USD. But the actual situation is far from that. According to the currently effective protocol revenue proposal, this mechanism only covers part of the transactions in V1 and V2, with the real annual buyback scale around 25 million USD, corresponding to approximately 5 million UNI tokens.

On the other hand, the approved support construction proposal allocates 20 million UNI tokens annually. These funds must ultimately be exchanged into stablecoins or fiat currency to be used for actual support, and such exchanges inevitably lead to market inflows. Based on this, the potential daily sell pressure is about 50,000 tokens, which is four times the actual amount burned.

What is concerning is that some people confuse the public by editing images, taking statements out of context, denying facts, and other means. They first deny the existence of the proposal, then change their stance to say the proposal exists but with a different nature, deleting key words to distort the original meaning. The fact is: the allocated funds will inevitably flow into the market, and this logical chain cannot be denied.

Market participants need to stay vigilant, recognize such false information, and make judgments based on actual data and proposal details.

UNI-2,92%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xmlx

· 9h ago

How is 25% of a billion only 400 million dollars?

View OriginalReply0

LidoStakeAddict

· 10h ago

Ha, it's the same scam again. I'm already tired of it. --- The story of 400 million USD is told so smoothly, but wait, only 25 million actually? Close enough. --- Every day 50,000 coins are dumped, and you still talk about destruction. I just smile. --- Changing words, deleting phrases, editing pictures—this combo is so familiar. Feels like I've seen it somewhere... --- Honestly, funding is just dumping coins. What are you pretending for, everyone? --- I really don't understand why someone would forcefully invent such lies. The data is right here. --- I'm fed up. Here comes another self-contradictory project team. --- A destruction number of 50 times. Where's the face of this manipulator? --- Deny first, then change your stance. I give full marks for this tactic. --- UNI should have woken up long ago. This economic model problem is indeed huge.

View OriginalReply0

FrogInTheWell

· 11h ago

The 400 million figure is really outrageous, looks fake at a glance --- Constantly touting buybacks, but every day just selling 50,000 UNI, who can stand that --- Starting to change their tune again? First saying there’s no proposal, then saying proposals are different, just messing around --- 2500 million buyback vs 2000 million funding flowing into the market, the math is clear --- I'm tired of the routine of editing images and deleting words, now they’re just outright lying --- Calculating full revenue based on some V1V2 transactions, this data is really quite inflated --- Is the selling pressure four times the amount of burns? Isn’t that just good news for dumping? --- Some people really treat us like fools, the facts are so clear yet they dare to change their tune --- Brighten your eyes, that’s true, but half the people don’t want to see the real data at all --- The UNI buyback mechanism feels more and more like just air

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 11h ago

This set of digital warehouse ledgers is increasingly resembling ancient manuscript copies—layer upon layer of paraphrasing, completely unrecognizable.

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 11h ago

Another contradictory one, denying first and then changing the story. I've seen this trick many times. People are too easily brainwashed by figures like 400 million; the actual number is only 25 million. Such a huge gap, yet they still have the audacity to promote it. 20 million coins are being invested every year, with a daily sell pressure of 50,000. This is what truly deserves attention.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdviser

· 11h ago

It's another round of marketing numbers game. The claim of 1 billion multiplied by 25% has long been debunked; the real figure is only 25 million, which is not a small difference. Who the hell still believes those backtracking people? First deny, then pretend to understand. It's too funny. The daily sell pressure of 50,000 coins seems to be the real focus here; need to think it over. Protocol revenue doesn't count all transactions, only V1 and V2. The market really depends on the details. Allocating funds into stablecoins is just a cut; the logical chain is very clear. There's nothing much to argue about with the data—it's all about who is willing to open their eyes.

View OriginalReply0