The DUSK ecosystem's zero-trust custody solution has recently delivered impressive results—total custodial assets have surpassed €200 million. This solution, jointly developed by DUSK and Cordial, has expanded continuously after real-world testing and is becoming a standard tool for institutions deploying RWA.



What is the core competitive advantage of this solution? First, it adopts a zero-trust architecture, completely eliminating reliance on centralized institutions. By leveraging cryptographic technology to harden asset security defenses, it also supports batch operations and real-time risk monitoring, capable of automatically alerting on abnormal transfers and illegal transactions—an essential feature for institutional investors.

Even more remarkable is the "default privacy + on-demand disclosure" design. Asset holding information is encrypted and protected, but can be directly provided as compliance proof during regulatory reviews. It neither exposes privacy nor conflicts with regulations. Achieving this balance is easier said than done, and few projects can truly get it right.

As traditional assets like European SME bonds and private equity accelerate their onboarding onto the blockchain, the application scope of such custody solutions is also expanding. DUSK is well-positioned to seize this window of opportunity, and the growth potential of assets remains strong.
DUSK7,4%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunitySlackervip
· 13h ago
200 million euros is indeed a lot, but the key question is whether it can withstand the next wave of institutional influx.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivorvip
· 17h ago
The zero-trust architecture is indeed well-developed, but is 200 million euros really enough? It feels like just the beginning.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacyvip
· 17h ago
ngl the whole "zero trust architecture" pitch is giving... overcomplicated governance theater? like sure, €200m sounds big until you realize half of crypto's "institutional adoption" stories collapse under scrutiny. the privacy-by-default angle is genuinely non-trivial though — stakeholder alignment between regulators and users rarely works this cleanly in practice.
Reply0
BlockchainWorkervip
· 17h ago
200 million euros is okay, but balancing privacy and compliance is really not easy.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamervip
· 17h ago
200 million euros is not a small number, but can we really trust this zero-trust architecture?
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChadvip
· 17h ago
200 million euros, this number is indeed quite impressive, but can privacy + compliance really be sustained in the long run?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 17h ago
200 million euros indeed look impressive, but can the balance between privacy and disclosure really be maintained?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTrainingvip
· 17h ago
Zero Trust architecture is indeed impressive, balancing privacy and compliance quite well.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)