LIT's recent decline has been quite sharp, dropping 20% in four days. Actually, from a trading logic perspective, going long and going short are completely different strategies.
Going long is like stacking blocks; if one piece is missing, the entire structure collapses. Every component needs to be in place before pushing upward. Going short is much simpler and more direct—find the pain point and hit it hard, and you can profit from this wave.
Why did LIT plunge? Basically, the whales haven't accumulated enough chips yet, and there's no motivation to push the price up. Since dropping from the 4.3 price level, retail investors' chips have been continuously sold off, and the whales haven't had the chance to consolidate and accumulate. Comparing this to HYPE's rhythm, which peaked at 45 yuan after listing and then dropped to 9 yuan, it took them a full two months to consolidate and accumulate before pushing the price back up. LIT has been listed for less than a month, and this time frame is simply not enough.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MagicBean
· 6h ago
That's what they say, but when retail investors are throwing chips, how come the big players can't see it? This logic is a bit far-fetched...
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 18h ago
I've heard this logic several times before; every time they say the market maker doesn't have enough accumulation, but it still drops.
Wait, was HYPE's wave also said the same? What's the situation now?
Short-term trading is all about betting on probabilities. Is the time cycle really that important?
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGas
· 18h ago
This dealer must be asleep, still planning to dump more?
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 18h ago
honestly the accumulation thesis here is just market entropy dressed up as grand strategy... whales need time, sure, but calling it "insufficient cycle" when we're watching real-time liquidation cascades? that's just copium with extra steps ngl
Reply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 18h ago
Retail investors are still selling off, and the market makers haven't had enough yet. The pace is really awkward, let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 18h ago
Retail investors really took a heavy hit this time; the big players are still accumulating, but they were beaten to a pulp. No wonder LIT can't stop.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 18h ago
Zhuang doesn't have enough chips to support the market, so there's no confidence to push the price up; this logic makes sense. The key is that the rhythm of LIT is indeed too rushed. Compared to the two-month consolidation period of HYPE, we're still far behind.
LIT's recent decline has been quite sharp, dropping 20% in four days. Actually, from a trading logic perspective, going long and going short are completely different strategies.
Going long is like stacking blocks; if one piece is missing, the entire structure collapses. Every component needs to be in place before pushing upward. Going short is much simpler and more direct—find the pain point and hit it hard, and you can profit from this wave.
Why did LIT plunge? Basically, the whales haven't accumulated enough chips yet, and there's no motivation to push the price up. Since dropping from the 4.3 price level, retail investors' chips have been continuously sold off, and the whales haven't had the chance to consolidate and accumulate. Comparing this to HYPE's rhythm, which peaked at 45 yuan after listing and then dropped to 9 yuan, it took them a full two months to consolidate and accumulate before pushing the price back up. LIT has been listed for less than a month, and this time frame is simply not enough.