Public chain development has historically relied on transparency as its core competitive advantage. But this also brings new issues—every transaction and contract interaction is exposed to the entire network, like a live broadcast. Is this progress or a trap?
Dusk Network has chosen a completely different path. It does not adopt the approach of patching after initial deployment (such as adding mixers or layering zero-knowledge protocols later), but instead rewrites from the ground up: consensus mechanisms, virtual machines, contract models—all designed around native privacy.
Take its Segregated Byzantine Agreement consensus as an example. It sounds very academic, but its effectiveness is quite hardcore: the network reaches consensus without everyone needing to see all data. Leader rotation is isolated, transaction data is encrypted and encapsulated before being packaged into blocks, and only the actual participants and necessary validators can interpret it. This way, you don’t have to worry about full nodes seeing your wallet balance.
Even more interesting is its Confidential Security Contracts scheme. Imagine real-world scenarios: structured product trading, private equity transfers, large receivables settlements between enterprises—these are highly confidential pieces of information, which are almost impossible to hide on traditional public chains. Dusk uses zero-knowledge range proofs combined with homomorphic encryption to achieve a delicate balance: contract logic is fully transparent and verifiable, but specific values, counterparty details, and amounts are kept hidden. This is the true fusion of privacy and verifiability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StableGeniusDegen
· 18h ago
Is the underlying privacy design approach really solid, but will the performance suffer when actually used?
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 01-20 16:42
Wow, finally someone has spoken frankly about privacy issues. The wallet balance live stream across the entire network is truly impressive.
Dusk's underlying privacy design sounds reliable, but what about its actual adoption rate? Ultimately, it's about user numbers.
Zero-knowledge proofs sound high-end, but is the execution efficiency really no problem? Or is it another case of lofty ideals versus harsh reality?
To be honest, there has to be some compromise between privacy and transparency. Whether Dusk's solution can truly break through remains to be seen.
If this approach can genuinely achieve a balance between confidential contracts and verifiability, then it's definitely a promising idea. But the devil is in the details.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 01-20 03:55
To be honest, I've heard this kind of routine many times when rewriting from the ground up. But this time, Dusk's isolated consensus design... is actually quite interesting. Data encryption is encapsulated before the block is created, preventing full nodes from seeing the balance details—that's the pain point I've been tracking on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStruggler
· 01-20 03:53
This is the public chain I want, I don't want to be exposed
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 01-20 03:49
Oh my God, this is exactly what I've been looking for. The underlying privacy design is truly different.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHands
· 01-20 03:44
No, the underlying privacy is indeed a pain point, but can Dusk's solution really be implemented? It still feels like just talk on paper.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 01-20 03:39
Finally, someone dares to make a move from the ground up. I'm really tired of being watched in my underwear every day.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 01-20 03:38
The underlying privacy design is indeed solid, much more robust than patch updates.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 01-20 03:29
Haha, finally someone is addressing the root of privacy issues, not just patching it.
Public chain development has historically relied on transparency as its core competitive advantage. But this also brings new issues—every transaction and contract interaction is exposed to the entire network, like a live broadcast. Is this progress or a trap?
Dusk Network has chosen a completely different path. It does not adopt the approach of patching after initial deployment (such as adding mixers or layering zero-knowledge protocols later), but instead rewrites from the ground up: consensus mechanisms, virtual machines, contract models—all designed around native privacy.
Take its Segregated Byzantine Agreement consensus as an example. It sounds very academic, but its effectiveness is quite hardcore: the network reaches consensus without everyone needing to see all data. Leader rotation is isolated, transaction data is encrypted and encapsulated before being packaged into blocks, and only the actual participants and necessary validators can interpret it. This way, you don’t have to worry about full nodes seeing your wallet balance.
Even more interesting is its Confidential Security Contracts scheme. Imagine real-world scenarios: structured product trading, private equity transfers, large receivables settlements between enterprises—these are highly confidential pieces of information, which are almost impossible to hide on traditional public chains. Dusk uses zero-knowledge range proofs combined with homomorphic encryption to achieve a delicate balance: contract logic is fully transparent and verifiable, but specific values, counterparty details, and amounts are kept hidden. This is the true fusion of privacy and verifiability.