The return of $CLIPPY has got people interested again. There's real reason to think this version could stick around longer than the last one—especially with the original creator stepping back into the picture. The previous iteration faded faster than expected, but having core team involvement this time around might be the catalyst it needs. 📎 Worth keeping an eye on as the project develops.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichVictim
· 8h ago
The return of the creator is indeed interesting, but to be honest... the last time it cooled off so quickly really made people a bit lose confidence.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 01-20 03:51
The original author's return is quite interesting, but to be honest, it cooled off so quickly last time that it's hard to say how long it will last this time.
View OriginalReply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidity
· 01-20 03:49
The return of the original creator is truly different this time. The last version failed because the team disbanded. This time, with core members watching over it, it might really last a bit longer. But to be honest, the CLIPPY project itself is a bit uncertain; it depends on how it is managed moving forward.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidation
· 01-20 03:44
Is it enough for the founder to return? That's what was said last time, but in the end, it still failed.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 01-20 03:43
The return of the original team is quite interesting, but I feel like we're about to repeat the same story again... Let's watch cautiously.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 01-20 03:31
So the team members are back. Hopefully this time they won't run away again...
The return of $CLIPPY has got people interested again. There's real reason to think this version could stick around longer than the last one—especially with the original creator stepping back into the picture. The previous iteration faded faster than expected, but having core team involvement this time around might be the catalyst it needs. 📎 Worth keeping an eye on as the project develops.