What exactly are the challenges in combining blockchain with traditional finance? To put it simply—it's about balancing innovation and efficiency, passing regulatory scrutiny, and not exposing transaction details. Recently, there's a project approach that’s quite interesting and worth a look.
They directly embed compliance rules into the protocol layer, combined with privacy smart contract technology, to find a balance between protecting transaction privacy and meeting regulatory review. The mainnet is already up and running.
Interestingly, the target clients for this solution are very clear—financial institutions and entities seeking to tokenize real-world assets (RWA). In other words, they are not chasing hot trends or trading hype; they are focused on building a long-term ecosystem.
From this perspective, if similar infrastructure can operate stably and gain regulatory approval, it provides a technical reference for bringing traditional assets onto the blockchain. The idea of integrating privacy and compliance at the protocol layer is still a direction that requires ongoing market validation.
Blockchain in the financial sector is still very young. For institutional-grade infrastructure to mature, it requires combined efforts from technology, regulation, and the market. This progress is indeed worth following for industry practitioners.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusDissenter
· 01-20 03:03
This approach is reliable, finally someone is seriously working on infrastructure.
---
Incorporating compliance into the protocol is indeed a tough move, but it still depends on how regulators respond.
---
RWA is the right path; the retail speculation approach should have been eliminated long ago.
---
Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? I have some doubts.
---
Running on the mainnet does not mean passing regulatory scrutiny; don't be too optimistic.
---
This is what institutional crypto should look like, not those ape coins.
---
Long-term ecosystem vs. quick profit from chopping leeks, who will the market choose?
---
Regulation at the protocol layer sounds quite novel, but can it actually be used?
---
Will traditional financial institutions really trust it? That depends on subsequent implementation.
---
Financial infrastructure is indeed not a short-term get-rich-quick game.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashier
· 01-20 02:56
Is incorporating compliance into the protocol layer a good idea? Sounds promising, but can this really run stably?
---
Whether RWA can take off depends on the attitude of regulatory authorities. It's still too early to tell.
---
Not chasing the trend is quite heartfelt, but this is truly the infrastructure approach.
---
How to balance privacy and compliance? I didn't quite understand the technical details.
---
Institutional-grade infrastructure has been mature for years. I guess a conservative estimate is to wait until the next cycle.
---
It sounds good, but I'm worried that if the mainnet runs unstably, it will be shut down.
---
This idea is well thought out, but the key is whether regulators can accept this plan.
---
I've heard a lot about long-term ecosystems, but ultimately, it depends on whether there is real demand.
---
Writing compliance rules into the protocol is easy; the key question is what to do if regulatory policies change later.
---
The contradiction between privacy and transparency has always existed. I haven't seen how they plan to truly resolve it.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTs
· 01-20 02:48
This is the right path. Projects that focus on the ecosystem without hype are very scarce.
---
Privacy compliance protocol layer integration... sounds complicated but this is indeed the breakthrough.
---
It sounds nice, but how many can truly withstand regulatory scrutiny?
---
What institutions need to enter the market is exactly this kind of thing. Reliable infrastructure is the real demand.
---
RWA (Real-World Assets) is truly the future, but the prerequisite is that someone must pave the way.
---
Writing compliance into the underlying protocol is interesting, but the implementation difficulty is probably not small.
---
Long-termism is good, but I'm worried it's just empty talk about ideals... let's wait and see the real performance of the mainnet.
---
The path of blockchain financialization is still early; someone needs to take the lead.
---
Balancing privacy and regulation at the protocol layer is indeed a good idea.
---
The key is whether regulatory authorities are willing to recognize it. No matter how advanced the technology is, it has to pass this hurdle.
What exactly are the challenges in combining blockchain with traditional finance? To put it simply—it's about balancing innovation and efficiency, passing regulatory scrutiny, and not exposing transaction details. Recently, there's a project approach that’s quite interesting and worth a look.
They directly embed compliance rules into the protocol layer, combined with privacy smart contract technology, to find a balance between protecting transaction privacy and meeting regulatory review. The mainnet is already up and running.
Interestingly, the target clients for this solution are very clear—financial institutions and entities seeking to tokenize real-world assets (RWA). In other words, they are not chasing hot trends or trading hype; they are focused on building a long-term ecosystem.
From this perspective, if similar infrastructure can operate stably and gain regulatory approval, it provides a technical reference for bringing traditional assets onto the blockchain. The idea of integrating privacy and compliance at the protocol layer is still a direction that requires ongoing market validation.
Blockchain in the financial sector is still very young. For institutional-grade infrastructure to mature, it requires combined efforts from technology, regulation, and the market. This progress is indeed worth following for industry practitioners.