Last year, the United States added $200 billion in tariff revenue, and the ultimate cost pressure almost entirely fell on consumers. This reflects a classic economic transmission mechanism—the transfer of policy costs downstream. From a market perspective, such policy adjustments often raise inflation expectations and subsequently influence asset allocation decisions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SilentAlpha
· 11h ago
A typical trap to fleece retail investors, policy dividends never favor retail investors...
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 11h ago
Just the same old trick, a new way to harvest the newbies.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 12h ago
yo this is peak wealth extraction theater... they tax at top layer but somehow it always trickles down to us plebs. seen this playbook a thousand times in defi, except there it's called sandwich attacks lmao. 200B just cascading through supply chains like toxic flow in mempool. consumer taking the L while someone builds alpha on the chaos. classic predator move ngl
Reply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 12h ago
Basically, the game of tariffs is just a way to milk profits, and in the end, it's still the common people who foot the bill.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 12h ago
nah wait, let me pull the data here... $200B tariff revenue flowing straight to consumers' wallets? pattern analysis suggests classic wealth extraction mechanism, not financial advice but this screams systematic transfer-down architecture. suspicious activity detected across inflation expectation vectors fr fr
Last year, the United States added $200 billion in tariff revenue, and the ultimate cost pressure almost entirely fell on consumers. This reflects a classic economic transmission mechanism—the transfer of policy costs downstream. From a market perspective, such policy adjustments often raise inflation expectations and subsequently influence asset allocation decisions.