As a Layer 1 blockchain dedicated exclusively to stablecoins, Plasma's native token is $XPL. The project's biggest selling point is zero-fee USDT transfers — which indeed sounds quite innovative. However, after an initial 200% surge upon launch, it immediately plummeted by 85%, with volatility reaching industry standards.
Currently, the numbers look promising: 44 exchanges listed, which sounds lively. But liquidity is actually quite tight, which is a real issue. The token supply structure has hidden risks — out of a total of 10 billion, only 1.98 billion are in circulation, with the rest unlocking monthly, creating selling pressure that will persist until 2028. Imagine how much pressure this long-term release schedule puts on the price.
Backed by capital support from figures like Peter Thiel, the project’s TVL once grew rapidly. Technologically, it is compatible with EVM and connected to Bitcoin cross-chain bridges, showing real effort in infrastructure. The problem is that the application ecosystem is still driven by mining incentives, leading to a severe lack of genuine demand — which is not a sustainable long-term strategy.
Ultimately, Plasma’s prospects depend on two variables: whether the ecosystem applications can truly take off, and how the regulatory environment evolves. The technical framework is in place; now it’s about whether they can develop products that users genuinely need.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
consensus_whisperer
· 15h ago
It's the same old trick again—zero fees + backed by big capital + hyped up technology, but it still can't escape the curse of token release...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 15h ago
Zero fees sound great, but the supply unlock pressure lasts until 2028. This wave of selling pressure could wipe out the gas savings you make...
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 15h ago
Zero fees sound great, but the unlocking pressure lasts until 2028... This pace is a bit desperate.
The ecosystem is still relying on incentives; when will there be real demand?
Peter Thiel's endorsement is good, but no matter how strong the technology is, it's useless if no one uses it.
Having 44 exchanges listed is not necessarily a good thing; liquidity is what really matters.
That 85% crash was truly a textbook example of a trap.
If mining incentives stop, can the ecosystem survive? That's what I worry about the most.
Zero fees are just a gimmick; the key point is that stablecoins themselves don't really have liquidity needs.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 15h ago
Zero fees sound great, but the selling pressure extends until 2028? This pace seems like they want to slowly harvest the profits.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggee
· 15h ago
Zero-hand fee sounds great, but looking at that unlock schedule gives me a headache. Will it only be fully unlocked in 2028? This pressure could freeze the price.
As a Layer 1 blockchain dedicated exclusively to stablecoins, Plasma's native token is $XPL. The project's biggest selling point is zero-fee USDT transfers — which indeed sounds quite innovative. However, after an initial 200% surge upon launch, it immediately plummeted by 85%, with volatility reaching industry standards.
Currently, the numbers look promising: 44 exchanges listed, which sounds lively. But liquidity is actually quite tight, which is a real issue. The token supply structure has hidden risks — out of a total of 10 billion, only 1.98 billion are in circulation, with the rest unlocking monthly, creating selling pressure that will persist until 2028. Imagine how much pressure this long-term release schedule puts on the price.
Backed by capital support from figures like Peter Thiel, the project’s TVL once grew rapidly. Technologically, it is compatible with EVM and connected to Bitcoin cross-chain bridges, showing real effort in infrastructure. The problem is that the application ecosystem is still driven by mining incentives, leading to a severe lack of genuine demand — which is not a sustainable long-term strategy.
Ultimately, Plasma’s prospects depend on two variables: whether the ecosystem applications can truly take off, and how the regulatory environment evolves. The technical framework is in place; now it’s about whether they can develop products that users genuinely need.