2026-01-20 02:11:23

#数字资产市场动态 $BNB's burning logic is indeed aggressive—destroying tokens in real-time on both buy and sell sides, directly locking the liquidity channels. This design has attracted a group of genuine contributors, and the consensus is quite solid. At the current pace, breaking two zeros is not a dream; it mainly depends on whether the participants' execution can keep up with expectations.

BNB-3,3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotSatoshi

· 15h ago

Breaking two zeros? The threshold is a bit high; it depends on whether the consensus can stay stable later on.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 19h ago

The destruction logic is indeed ruthless, but we've seen this trick too many times, and there are very few who can truly hold up.

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 19h ago

Damn, this destruction mechanism is really ruthless, directly discouraging retail investors --- Removing two zeros? Let's see if it can withstand the pressure later --- Real-time destruction sounds impressive, but is the liquidity really okay? --- Solid consensus, right? Then why are so many still cutting? --- The fact that execution isn't meeting expectations is very honest; can the project team stay stable? --- This kind of design is more like screening people, indeed ruthless --- Locking liquidity might actually be a good thing? Can't quite understand it --- Whether there are many participants in construction is another story; there are definitely many who are just harvesting profits --- Removing two zeros is indeed tempting, but only if it can survive until then --- The destruction gameplay is innovative, but the risks are also quite high

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 19h ago

I’ve looked at the destruction logic, and it’s indeed intense. However, whether this wave can be sustained depends on the subsequent real money support.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxAddict

· 19h ago

The destruction mechanism sounds powerful, but locking up liquidity is really a double-edged sword.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 20h ago

The destruction mechanism is essentially an art form on the supply side, packaging scarcity into consensus—it's indeed impressive when viewed through the supply and demand curve, but don't be fooled by the narrative; execution always remains the biggest unknown.

View OriginalReply0

MidsommarWallet

· 20h ago

The destruction mechanism is indeed aggressive this time, but how many can truly hold up?

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant