2026-01-20 00:35:21

It's becoming clearer now—many development teams shipped way too early. Waiting for agentic coding assistants to mature would've saved serious time and resources.

Look at the trajectory: coding agents are getting smarter, video generation tools are leveling up, multimodal AI keeps improving. The pattern is obvious. If you're building something now, ask yourself honestly—will this be faster to develop manually, or should you sit tight and let AI catch up first?

The math changes when you factor in six-month or one-year development cycles. Sometimes lazy beats rushing. Your backlog can probably wait while the tooling catches up. Better infrastructure beats early-mover disadvantage in plenty of cases.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
9
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

WhaleSurfer

· 01-22 23:07

ngl This statement sounds cool, but in practice, it's just gambling. Who dares to really wait for AI to mature?

---

There's some truth to it, but it's too idealistic. In reality, investors won't give you the time to "wait for the tools"...

---

This logic is flawed. Releasing early and collecting user feedback is much more valuable than just waiting in silence.

---

Laziness does win, but only if you survive until the day AI explodes.

---

Here we go again, blaming the product manager for rushing the launch; now you're saying it was too early...

---

Indeed, many projects are rushed out, just look at how many small teams have gone bankrupt now.

---

Thinking it through, this theory works for big companies, but for small startups, it's just waiting to die.

---

AI tools are really iterating rapidly, but the problem is, no one knows when they will be considered "mature."

View OriginalReply0

BlockDetective

· 01-22 15:58

NGL, it's too late to regret now. If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have stayed late working overtime on those repetitive codes.

View OriginalReply0

BTCRetirementFund

· 01-22 11:34

Basically, it's that we can't compete with AI anymore. Instead of working 996 and writing crappy code, it's better to wait until we're familiar with the tools.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCry

· 01-21 10:43

NGL, this logic is a bit off... Honestly, by the time AI matures, the flowers will have withered.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 01-20 01:05

ngl, this logic sounds good, but in practice, it's a whole different story... Who the hell can wait?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityOracle

· 01-20 01:03

That's really well said. I'm currently facing this pain point. The project rushed to launch two years ago now feels somewhat redundant, as the maturity of AI tools has completely changed.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 01-20 00:56

To be honest, many teams are just short-sighted and profit-driven. The AI tools are experiencing a rebirth, and entering the market now might really be much better than rushing in last year [Laughing].

This time, what are we waiting for to buy the dip? Giving tools time to build momentum is worth more than rushing to work tirelessly. Rebuilding the mindset, brothers.

View OriginalReply0

UnruggableChad

· 01-20 00:48

This guy's point is spot on. Those still coding manually should really reflect.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-20 00:36

Stop talking nonsense. Back then, we had no choice but to start early; there was no option. Now saying to wait until AI matures is indeed heartbreaking, but who knew it would develop like this back then? Truly.

View OriginalReply0