2026-01-19 22:41:28

Some project promoters are calling out the irony: critics who publicly slam reward-based posting systems turn around and offer sponsored posts for $200. The contradiction between denouncing incentive models and capitalizing on them reveals deeper tensions in how Web3 projects handle community engagement versus paid promotion.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidsommarWallet

· 12m ago

Basically, it's double standards. They oppose incentive models in words but turn around and sell sponsorships... This kind of tactic is very common in Web3.

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll

· 01-19 23:11

Well... the nice way to say it is "flexible and adaptable," but the harsh truth is double standards. There are plenty of people like that in this circle.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainNewbie

· 01-19 23:11

Haha, this is hilarious. These people shout about opposing the incentive system, but then turn around and sell copywriting for $200. Truly amazing.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 01-19 23:08

These people really crack me up. They shout about opposing the incentive mechanism, but turn around and sell sponsorship posts for $200. It's a classic case of only allowing officials to set fires and not letting the common people light lamps.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichVictim

· 01-19 22:57

Exactly right, these guys are really something... They oppose incentive mechanisms verbally, but then turn around and post sponsorships for $200 each. It's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 01-19 22:47

Basically, those who oppose the incentive model verbally are turning around and charging $200 per sponsored post. It really cracks me up.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 01-19 22:45

Well... the polite way to put it is "flexible and adaptable," but a less polite way is double standards. In the Web3 community, stuff like this happens all the time.

View OriginalReply0