Having worked in financial auditing for years, I’ve discovered a foolproof rule: there’s no such thing as a free lunch. The hidden costs aren’t disappearing; they’re just being shifted elsewhere.



Take Plasma, a Layer 1 chain, for example. Its hottest selling point is "USDT transfers with no Gas fees." For those who have been stuck with 0.01 ETH in fees on Ethereum, this definitely sounds like a savior. But after digging into its Paymaster mechanism, I realized how ingenious this design is — in other words, how cleverly it shifts costs elsewhere.

Let’s first explain how this "free" operation works. You can transfer USDT without paying XPL, but that doesn’t mean miners are doing it for free. There’s a role called Paymaster, which acts as middleware between the user and the underlying smart contract layer. The truth is, application developers or the Plasma Foundation pre-deposit XPL and then pay the transaction fees on behalf of specific users according to the rules. It sounds generous, but this is just cost-shifting — only done in a very smart way.

This design leverages the Reth client’s full compatibility with the EVM, bringing over the complex meta-transaction mechanism from the Ethereum ecosystem. In other words, it’s not some black technology; it’s simply applying an existing cost externalization scheme to the USDT settlement scenario.

So the question is: who is the real payer? Where do the costs flow? These are the questions that must be honestly answered when conducting risk control audits. Don’t be fooled by the illusion of "free"; someone is always footing the bill behind the scenes.
XPL-2,31%
ETH-2,63%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RuntimeErrorvip
· 9h ago
Well said, but I'm afraid people are being brainwashed by the words "free" and not asking where the money went.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidatorvip
· 9h ago
Hi, I've seen through the Paymaster trick a long time ago. Basically, it's just transferring your bills to the foundation. Oh my god, another project that uses "free" to lure people in. No one wants to admit that the costs don't just disappear. Wait, so developers end up paying for all these "free" transactions? The foundation must be losing a lot. This is ridiculous. A phishing-style Layer 1, the audit report should have shut this down long ago. Paymaster is just putting lipstick on a pig; at the end of the day, it's just moving the miner fee to another account. You're all being played. Who cares about gas fee exemptions anyway? In the end, someone has to pay, so just go ahead and pay. Sounds like a project designed to run away, with a responsibility chain so blurry it's a mess.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 9h ago
Basically, it's just shifting the costs somewhere else; developers and the foundation are footing the bill.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlanvip
· 9h ago
Oh my God, someone finally exposed this layer of deception. I've always thought the so-called "free" claim of Plasma was ridiculous; it turns out the cost is just moving it around, and someone still has to cover the bottom.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 9h ago
yo, this is literally just the 2017 playbook with extra steps. remember when everyone was hyped about "free transactions" on various L1s? history rhyming so hard rn it's almost musical lol
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)