Zero-knowledge proofs look solid on paper, but let's be real—how do they actually handle scaling to massive transaction volumes? The cryptographic elegance is there, but when we're talking about millions of transactions per second, the computational overhead becomes a genuine bottleneck. Is the current architecture even capable of hitting those throughput targets without sacrificing security or decentralization?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenGambler
· 15h ago
zk proof sounds cool, but when it comes to millions of TPS, can the computing power handle it? To be honest, it's still a trade-off; the classic triangle problem can't be bypassed.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 15h ago
zk proof sounds impressive, but in practice it's still so-so; there's too much hype involved.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 15h ago
zk proofs sound impressive, but once you reach the million TPS level, it becomes obvious. No one can bypass the computational workload.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 15h ago
To put it simply, ZK proofs are indeed impressive in theory, but in practice? Well, let's be modest.
Zero-knowledge proofs look solid on paper, but let's be real—how do they actually handle scaling to massive transaction volumes? The cryptographic elegance is there, but when we're talking about millions of transactions per second, the computational overhead becomes a genuine bottleneck. Is the current architecture even capable of hitting those throughput targets without sacrificing security or decentralization?