DUSK's recent price surge is indeed a bit perplexing. I remember it trading at $0.049 in early January, and now it’s directly hitting $0.2—a fourfold increase just like that. After a certain exchange launched perpetual contracts on the 17th, the market was pushed even higher.
Not long after the mainnet launched, that official tweet hit over 4 million views and 2,000 likes. The community’s enthusiasm is obvious, and it feels like a breakout could happen at any moment.
I spent quite some time studying its RPOW consensus mechanism—a zero-knowledge proof layered with compliance shell, designed specifically for RWA scenarios as a privacy execution environment. When Chainlink announced integration, that November tweet covered 15 chains, and this project was prominently listed. Oracles directly connect to real-world assets, bridging on-chain tokenized bonds and similar instruments—that’s the real key. Unlike Monero’s pure privacy coin approach, DUSK takes a compliant route, and under the EU’s MiCA framework, it might actually operate comfortably.
But here’s a question mark—given the price increase, is there enough trading volume to support it? Several major exchanges list trading pairs like USDT, BTC, and USDC, and multiple platforms have gone live with it. However, traces of delisted trading pairs still remain, and liquidity appears fragmented. If TVL remains in the few millions of dollars range and FDV suddenly jumps to $500 million, that’s a warning sign. With circulating supply just over 200 million and total supply at 500 million, if the unlock cliff approaches, the selling pressure could be significant.
Looking into discussions around RWA, some projects are analyzing DUSK alongside NXRA and LMR, indicating this sector is quite hot. The question is—can it really break out from the RWA wave? Cross-chain bridge security, ZK-rollup privacy layers, and the necessary data exposure during execution all sound solid, but what about audit reports? Which firm conducted them? Not seeing that information makes me uneasy.
From a trading perspective: at the current price of $0.2, RSI is definitely overbought. A short-term correction to $0.18 is quite possible. It’s better to see if it can hold above $0.10 before assessing market performance. If the mainnet TVL truly breaks $100 million and RWA pilot projects are implemented, long positions could consider adding to their holdings—but don’t go all-in. Privacy tokens are under regulatory scrutiny, and that line can be crossed at any moment.
Ultimately, DUSK isn’t a gamble for quick profits; it should be viewed as an L1 privacy infrastructure. Keep an eye on on-chain block times and validator staking distribution. If the decentralization score exceeds 80, then it’s worth paying more attention.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeCurator
· 01-19 21:43
What the hell is a fourfold increase? This wave of the market is really a bit crazy.
View OriginalReply0
DegenGambler
· 01-19 21:41
A fourfold increase is not scary; what worries me is liquidity fragmentation—that's the biggest pitfall.
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 01-19 21:33
Four times the increase, I dare not chase it. This rhythm feels a bit虚
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 01-19 21:27
0.049 to 0.2? That's an outrageous increase, feels a bit inflated.
Starting to pump without even seeing the audit report, I've seen this trick too many times.
Liquidity fragmentation and unlocking cliffs, you really can't avoid a dump when it happens.
The RWA track is hot, but whether DUSK can break through is really uncertain.
Regulation is indeed a very sensitive line; privacy coins can easily trigger issues at any time.
Holding onto 0.10 is already pretty good; are those buying in now just taking over the bag?
DUSK's recent price surge is indeed a bit perplexing. I remember it trading at $0.049 in early January, and now it’s directly hitting $0.2—a fourfold increase just like that. After a certain exchange launched perpetual contracts on the 17th, the market was pushed even higher.
Not long after the mainnet launched, that official tweet hit over 4 million views and 2,000 likes. The community’s enthusiasm is obvious, and it feels like a breakout could happen at any moment.
I spent quite some time studying its RPOW consensus mechanism—a zero-knowledge proof layered with compliance shell, designed specifically for RWA scenarios as a privacy execution environment. When Chainlink announced integration, that November tweet covered 15 chains, and this project was prominently listed. Oracles directly connect to real-world assets, bridging on-chain tokenized bonds and similar instruments—that’s the real key. Unlike Monero’s pure privacy coin approach, DUSK takes a compliant route, and under the EU’s MiCA framework, it might actually operate comfortably.
But here’s a question mark—given the price increase, is there enough trading volume to support it? Several major exchanges list trading pairs like USDT, BTC, and USDC, and multiple platforms have gone live with it. However, traces of delisted trading pairs still remain, and liquidity appears fragmented. If TVL remains in the few millions of dollars range and FDV suddenly jumps to $500 million, that’s a warning sign. With circulating supply just over 200 million and total supply at 500 million, if the unlock cliff approaches, the selling pressure could be significant.
Looking into discussions around RWA, some projects are analyzing DUSK alongside NXRA and LMR, indicating this sector is quite hot. The question is—can it really break out from the RWA wave? Cross-chain bridge security, ZK-rollup privacy layers, and the necessary data exposure during execution all sound solid, but what about audit reports? Which firm conducted them? Not seeing that information makes me uneasy.
From a trading perspective: at the current price of $0.2, RSI is definitely overbought. A short-term correction to $0.18 is quite possible. It’s better to see if it can hold above $0.10 before assessing market performance. If the mainnet TVL truly breaks $100 million and RWA pilot projects are implemented, long positions could consider adding to their holdings—but don’t go all-in. Privacy tokens are under regulatory scrutiny, and that line can be crossed at any moment.
Ultimately, DUSK isn’t a gamble for quick profits; it should be viewed as an L1 privacy infrastructure. Keep an eye on on-chain block times and validator staking distribution. If the decentralization score exceeds 80, then it’s worth paying more attention.