When a major AI project falters, it doesn't mean the technology itself is flawed—it just marks the end of one hype cycle's most aggressive builder.



Here's the thing though: the first ones to sail across the ocean aren't necessarily the ones who actually settle and thrive there. Speed to market matters less than you'd think. The pioneers often pave the way for the real winners to follow.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhobiavip
· 12h ago
That's right, many people are still talking about first mover advantage, but little do they know that the ones who capsize the fastest are often the ones rushing the hardest...
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 12h ago
Haha, that's right. This is the most genuine scene in Web3—early crazies paving the way for later adopters to get a bargain.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddictvip
· 12h ago
Haha, that's right. A bunch of projects burning through money to sprint is useless; in the end, it still comes down to who can survive the longest.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatchervip
· 12h ago
Being the first to move doesn't necessarily make you the winner; this logic is too common in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomadvip
· 12h ago
That's right, buddy. OpenAI's current situation isn't a death knell; it's just a process of淘沙.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)