2026-01-19 20:31:32

Never worked at an investment bank? Count your blessings. You dodged having to shake off years of outdated playbook nonsense.

Think about it: drop $150k on a finance degree, only to realize you could've picked up the same knowledge from overdue library fines. The irony hits different when you're already in crypto.

Not my rules—just how the game works.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes

Reward
4
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiDoctor

· 1h ago

Medical records show that the clinical manifestation of traditional financial education is a severe mismatch between capital investment and knowledge output. The things gained from a 150k tuition fee have long been verified by code and data in crypto. It is recommended that such patients regularly review their learning ROI—liquidity indicators often reveal issues.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBarber

· 01-19 20:59

150k in tuition fees, but understanding a single candlestick is more valuable. This is the gap between tradfi and crypto.

View OriginalReply0

FrogInTheWell

· 01-19 20:55

That Wall Street stuff should have been thrown into the trash long ago, and I shouldn't have spent 150k to learn it... jumping straight into the crypto world is way better.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-19 20:40

The traditional financial system is really repeatedly eroding people's desire for innovation. Spending 150k is not as beneficial as spending two years hustling in crypto to learn faster.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedTwice

· 01-19 20:32

Haha, really. The investment banking methods should have been phased out long ago. They're still teaching those things from 2008.

View OriginalReply0