The token unlock system at launch really needs a redesign. It's problematic when developers can claim their full allocation right from day one—essentially walking away with unlocked tokens the moment a project goes live. We've seen this play out twice already within seven days. This kind of structure creates obvious incentive misalignment and raises red flags about project credibility. If devs are dumping immediately, it signals they're not actually invested in long-term success. Projects should rethink their vesting schedules and lock-in periods to align founder interests with community interests.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TeaTimeTrader
· 3h ago
Funny, unlocking everything right at the opening... Isn't this just telling everyone "I'm out"?
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 15h ago
Oh wow, this is outrageous. Fully unlocked right at the opening? Developers run away on the same day? Who designed this thing?
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 01-21 15:58
ngl That's why I never touch projects without vesting. If the dev can run away on day one, what's the point of playing?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTherapist
· 01-19 20:57
ngl this hits different when you see the psychological resistance levels breaking down in real time. devs dumping instantly? that's not just poor tokenomics, that's basically admitting "i don't trust my own project" on a neurological level. pretty wild self-sabotage if you ask me.
Reply0
AirdropJunkie
· 01-19 20:51
Projects that don't lock funds just run away, how can I trust you?
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 01-19 20:47
ngl that's why I immediately pass on projects without lock-up periods now, it's really too obvious.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 01-19 20:37
From an on-chain archaeology perspective, this design logic of zero lock-up periods actually contradicts the original intention of early digital assets — the lack of a proof of the creator's commitment.
The token unlock system at launch really needs a redesign. It's problematic when developers can claim their full allocation right from day one—essentially walking away with unlocked tokens the moment a project goes live. We've seen this play out twice already within seven days. This kind of structure creates obvious incentive misalignment and raises red flags about project credibility. If devs are dumping immediately, it signals they're not actually invested in long-term success. Projects should rethink their vesting schedules and lock-in periods to align founder interests with community interests.