In the traditional financial world, key processes such as trading, settlement, and asset management are all controlled by centralized institutions. The result is cumbersome, inefficient workflows, concerns over data transparency, and user privacy that is difficult to safeguard.



Have you ever wondered what would happen if the financial markets were moved onto the blockchain, addressing both privacy and regulatory challenges—two seemingly opposing issues?

Dusk Network is doing exactly that. It is a Layer-1 privacy blockchain tailored for regulated financial markets. Its core weapon is advanced cryptographic technology like zero-knowledge proofs. Simply put, it allows verification of transaction legality and compliance without revealing sensitive data. Asset issuance, transfer, and settlement can all be completed on-chain, enabling regulators to see what they need to see, while protecting user privacy where it should be.

Everyone knows the problem with traditional public blockchains—everything is transparent. For ordinary users, this is seen as the spirit of decentralization, but for institutions and corporate clients? It means trade secrets, holdings information, and transaction details are all exposed to the sunlight. Competitors, hackers, and malicious actors can see everything.

Dusk’s approach is to establish a "selective transparency" mechanism. Authorized regulators and participating parties can see the data they need, while others have no access. This meets financial regulatory requirements while maintaining privacy boundaries.

There is a common misconception—privacy and compliance must inevitably conflict. Actually, that’s not true. Dusk’s design philosophy is quite the opposite: privacy is not an afterthought or patch, but something embedded into the system’s DNA from the very beginning. Through zero-knowledge proofs, the network can verify that on-chain operations comply with anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing, and other financial regulations, while keeping user data confidential. These two goals are not only compatible but can also mutually reinforce each other.
DUSK-3,17%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 3h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound pretty impressive, but can they really strike a balance between institutions and privacy? It still feels very challenging.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulledvip
· 17h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound sophisticated, but can they really fool regulators?
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzlervip
· 17h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound great in theory, but how do they perform in real-world applications? It always seems like privacy and regulation can truly be balanced, and traditional finance has already handled that long ago.
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBiasvip
· 17h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but how many are truly practical?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborervip
· 17h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but how many are truly practical? If Dusk can really combine privacy and compliance, institutional clients will definitely rush to adopt it.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTradervip
· 18h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but there aren't many projects that can really utilize them. The idea behind Dusk is indeed quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYearsvip
· 18h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they really be implemented? Will regulators buy into this? That's the key question. Dusk's approach is indeed innovative; privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive. The traditional financial system definitely needs to be broken down; it's too sluggish. "Selective transparency" sounds good, but I'm worried it's just an illusion. Finally, someone is thinking about solving privacy issues at the source. Do institutional clients really care about this, or is it just a gimmick? I read about zero-knowledge proofs three times but still can't fully understand them, haha. This is what blockchain should be doing, not just speculating on coins. A regulator-friendly blockchain feels like a contradiction.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)