Recently, I revisited information about Walrus and found that this project indeed doesn't get enough attention in the market. At first glance, it seems to be about decentralized storage, similar to the old, well-established tracks. But upon closer inspection, the logic is completely different.
The core problem Walrus aims to solve is quite clear—why is storage so expensive, and why is it hard to use? Traditional decentralized storage gets stuck on these two issues. It uses erasure coding to lower costs, combined with Sui's high performance, making the entire process of data on-chain, retrieval, and verification much smoother. For developers, this means it can actually be used, not just talked about.
The application scenarios are very practical. AI training data, social networks, NFT metadata—these are all moving onto the chain, and the demand for storage will only become more urgent. There needs to be a reliable place to store this data. More importantly, Walrus also supports fine-grained privacy protection and access control, which are essential for enterprise projects and applications with compliance requirements. This makes it not just infrastructure but more like a platform capable of supporting complex business operations.
The tokenomics also show that the team is serious. Token distribution favors the community, and nodes and users can participate in governance through staking to earn rewards. This design can truly activate the ecosystem rather than just keep it running in circles. The team's execution pace is steady, without the impatience of rushing to raise funds immediately.
Ultimately, Walrus is a project with a solid technical foundation, a steady pace, and long-term potential. As the Sui ecosystem expands, it’s very likely to become the default storage layer for many applications, and the value will naturally be reflected over time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainOracle
· 8h ago
Erasure coding is really impressive; this is the first time I've seen costs pushed so low.
---
Honestly, if the Sui ecosystem can take off, Walrus really has a chance.
---
Privacy protection + permission management—this is what enterprise-level applications truly need, not just hype.
---
Compared to those projects that raise funds every day, those quietly working are actually more reliable.
---
The trend of AI training data moving onto the chain is real; storage bottlenecks will be solved sooner or later.
---
I believe in tokenomics leaning towards the community; the key is whether there is real usage afterward.
---
Wait, are there many ecosystem applications for Walrus now? It feels like the storage track has always been loud but not impactful.
---
Fine-grained privacy indeed solves the pain points of traditional storage, but is the cost really that much cheaper than IPFS?
---
The default storage layer is a big topic; let's see the actual adoption rate.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwich
· 11h ago
The Sui ecosystem this time, Walrus is indeed underestimated. Storage itself is a necessity, and the key is that they have truly optimized costs and usability.
The idea of erasure coding isn't new, but combined with Sui's TPS, it directly becomes a productivity tool, which is the real differentiator. Compared to the IPFS approach, it's definitely much smoother.
The trend of on-chain AI data is unstoppable, and there needs to be a reliable place for it. Walrus's permission management indeed has advantages. But it still depends on the actual adoption rate; it's still early days.
The tokenomics design is not overly aggressive, and I agree with that. Unlike some projects that run after fundraising, Walrus's pace shows they are genuinely interested in building an ecosystem. When Sui truly scales up, the default storage layer will be even more valuable.
By the way, why is the team so low-profile? Are they really not good at marketing, or is it intentional?
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 11h ago
Erasure coding indeed solves the pain points, but what truly determines the success or failure of Walrus is whether the governance mechanism can hold up. The token leans towards the community, which sounds good, but the question is: is the staking governance design truly incentive-compatible? There have been quite a few projects in history that failed at this point...
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 11h ago
Erasure coding definitely reduces costs, but could it also be another story that looks good on paper but can't really be pushed forward?
Does anyone actually use it? Or will we have to wait another five years to see real applications?
Is the Sui ecosystem that big? Feels like the buzz isn't enough.
Even if the tokenomics are well-designed, it depends on whether users buy in and whether the community can truly become active.
Gee, another infrastructure project... Storage projects seem to often be overlooked.
Fine-grained privacy is indeed a selling point; enterprise-level demand is right there waiting.
Rather than just telling stories, I want to see if major applications are already integrated.
Can Sui's performance advantages translate into Walrus's advantages? That logical chain isn't necessarily valid.
The biggest fear for projects like this is that even good wine fears the alley being too deep; they need leading applications to break through.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuyer
· 11h ago
Erasure coding is indeed powerful; I never expected the costs to be pushed so low.
Once the Sui ecosystem grows, Walrus will grow with it. Betting on this logic makes sense.
Tokenomics is leaning towards the community; finally, I see some serious effort.
Privacy permission management is truly an enterprise-level necessity; previous projects didn't think of this.
The storage track has always been criticized, but Walrus's smooth user experience already means they've won.
Node staking governance—it's not easy for the ecosystem to truly operate.
Honestly, in the long run, on the Sui chain, the default storage layer is undoubtedly theirs.
Recently, I revisited information about Walrus and found that this project indeed doesn't get enough attention in the market. At first glance, it seems to be about decentralized storage, similar to the old, well-established tracks. But upon closer inspection, the logic is completely different.
The core problem Walrus aims to solve is quite clear—why is storage so expensive, and why is it hard to use? Traditional decentralized storage gets stuck on these two issues. It uses erasure coding to lower costs, combined with Sui's high performance, making the entire process of data on-chain, retrieval, and verification much smoother. For developers, this means it can actually be used, not just talked about.
The application scenarios are very practical. AI training data, social networks, NFT metadata—these are all moving onto the chain, and the demand for storage will only become more urgent. There needs to be a reliable place to store this data. More importantly, Walrus also supports fine-grained privacy protection and access control, which are essential for enterprise projects and applications with compliance requirements. This makes it not just infrastructure but more like a platform capable of supporting complex business operations.
The tokenomics also show that the team is serious. Token distribution favors the community, and nodes and users can participate in governance through staking to earn rewards. This design can truly activate the ecosystem rather than just keep it running in circles. The team's execution pace is steady, without the impatience of rushing to raise funds immediately.
Ultimately, Walrus is a project with a solid technical foundation, a steady pace, and long-term potential. As the Sui ecosystem expands, it’s very likely to become the default storage layer for many applications, and the value will naturally be reflected over time.