Here's an honest piece of advice: when choosing a project, the CTO's past track record is very important. Technical leaders without successful experience often lack vision, and those without industry influence should be even more cautious—they usually follow a pattern of private early-stage accumulation and then sell off significantly at critical moments.



How far a project can go essentially depends on three factors: whether the founding team has industry experience and the ability to break into new circles, whether the project itself has gained capital recognition, and whether team members can adapt to market changes. All three are indispensable. If the founder's vision is limited, fundraising is difficult, and there is no network effect to drive growth, frankly, the failure rate of such projects can be as high as 99%. Many people have lost everything because they overestimated a CTO's capabilities. I hope everyone conducts thorough due diligence before investing and doesn't be fooled by attractive technical solutions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TrustMeBrovip
· 13h ago
Really, I've seen too many CTOs rely on a beautiful PPT to cut leeks; technical people without a background are the best actors. Team structure determines everything. This saying hits the point—what's the use of just being technically awesome? It's that same pre-investment due diligence argument, but indeed, 90% of people skip this step. Private accumulation and then running away at critical moments—I've seen this routine many times... No matter how eloquent you are, it can't be stopped. Thinking back, I checked the CTO's resume of a certain project, and it was all fluff. Now it's cooled off—a warning.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImpostervip
· 13h ago
Damn, this is the real reason I suffered a huge loss in 2021... That CTO's resume was full of fancy stuff, but they couldn't even secure funding before they started shipping.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurkervip
· 13h ago
How is the 99% failure rate calculated... it feels a bit absolute.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911vip
· 13h ago
Having looked at so many rug projects, I really need to remember more. As a CTO with no track record, I just pass directly. --- Honestly, the team’s vision can determine 99%, and fancy technical solutions are useless. --- I’ve heard too many stories of total loss; now when choosing projects, you must investigate the founders’ backgrounds, or you’re just giving money to scammers. --- Difficult fundraising, lack of influence, small vision—having all three is a ticking time bomb. --- I’ve seen too many cases of large private placements followed by massive sell-offs. Now, I advise anyone who dares to touch an unknown CTO to think twice. --- Capital recognition is very important; projects with backing are always more reliable than those without. --- Due diligence really can’t be skipped; one thorough check can save you a lot of money, which is very valuable.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 13h ago
Another argument of "CTO determinism"... Haven't we seen enough of this?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)