Walrus this project has never been easy to understand because it is not targeting current pain points, but rather the problems that Web3 will inevitably need to solve in the future.
What is Web3 busy with at this stage? Nothing more than transaction speed, Gas fees, liquidation efficiency, MEV issues, cross-chain synchronization—these are all optimizations at the financial system level.
But think about it, a network that can truly serve hundreds of millions of users, its core competitiveness is not in finance, but in data.
In the Web2 world, how much data do you generate every day? Videos, images, texts, various collaboration records, model parameters, historical states, behavior tracking—these are the real entities of the digital ecosystem. Transfer records have become a minor part.
Walrus's fundamental assumption is: Web3 cannot stay forever at the settlement layer; it will inevitably evolve into a content layer. Once it enters the content layer, the requirements for storage change completely.
In the past, storing a 3KB JSON file was enough; now, handling a 30MB object is necessary. Previously, it was "store it and be done," now it is "must be able to recover, verify, and preserve permanently."
This is the fundamental difference between Walrus and most storage protocols on the market.
Other storage solutions focus on: how to store data more cheaply.
Walrus's approach is: when data volume explodes exponentially, how can the system avoid crashing.
Therefore, it adopts erasure coding technology. An object is divided into dozens of data fragments; as long as you gather a certain proportion of these fragments, you can fully restore the original data. What is the benefit of doing this? In theory, it can reduce data redundancy from 3 times to nearly 1 time.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWanderingPoet
· 13h ago
To be honest, this article clarified everything for me. It turns out Walrus isn't just optimizing current issues.
It seems most projects are competing in financial efficiency, but Walrus is playing a bigger game... data is the real mining.
View OriginalReply0
NotAFinancialAdvice
· 13h ago
Wow, someone finally explained the Walrus logic clearly. Most people are still focused on Gas fees, while others are already thinking about things ten years from now.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 14h ago
I've always felt that everyone is playing financial games, and no one has considered that data is the real key.
Interesting, finally someone sees through it.
Erasure coding is indeed powerful, but can it really be implemented?
It seems like Walrus is playing a big game, but unfortunately, not many people understand it now.
The day of data explosion will truly arrive, and then we'll see who has foresight.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 14h ago
To be honest, this perspective is interesting. Most people are still focused on gas fees and transaction speed, while Walrus is thinking about how the system will survive during data explosion. It feels like playing chess—others are still figuring out how to capture the opponent's pawns, while it is already planning the entire layout. I need to ponder more on the erasure coding part.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 14h ago
This idea is indeed brilliant, but it still feels a bit ahead of its time. Is there really someone in the industry who needs this?
Walrus this project has never been easy to understand because it is not targeting current pain points, but rather the problems that Web3 will inevitably need to solve in the future.
What is Web3 busy with at this stage? Nothing more than transaction speed, Gas fees, liquidation efficiency, MEV issues, cross-chain synchronization—these are all optimizations at the financial system level.
But think about it, a network that can truly serve hundreds of millions of users, its core competitiveness is not in finance, but in data.
In the Web2 world, how much data do you generate every day? Videos, images, texts, various collaboration records, model parameters, historical states, behavior tracking—these are the real entities of the digital ecosystem. Transfer records have become a minor part.
Walrus's fundamental assumption is: Web3 cannot stay forever at the settlement layer; it will inevitably evolve into a content layer. Once it enters the content layer, the requirements for storage change completely.
In the past, storing a 3KB JSON file was enough; now, handling a 30MB object is necessary. Previously, it was "store it and be done," now it is "must be able to recover, verify, and preserve permanently."
This is the fundamental difference between Walrus and most storage protocols on the market.
Other storage solutions focus on: how to store data more cheaply.
Walrus's approach is: when data volume explodes exponentially, how can the system avoid crashing.
Therefore, it adopts erasure coding technology. An object is divided into dozens of data fragments; as long as you gather a certain proportion of these fragments, you can fully restore the original data. What is the benefit of doing this? In theory, it can reduce data redundancy from 3 times to nearly 1 time.