Injective on-chain governance proposal has just been implemented, with the support rate reaching 99.9%—this number is already considered a rare consensus in DAO voting. What is the core of this update? Reduce the INJ supply while optimizing the burn mechanism to lower inflation.
It seems the reform is quite substantial. The new phase design aims to accelerate the net token supply contraction, working in synergy with the existing community buyback program. Theoretically, tightening the supply side usually supports the price—but reality often proves otherwise.
After the INJ proposal was approved by voting, there was indeed a reaction, with a short-term increase of about 2%, but it was immediately dragged down by larger market declines, eventually falling back by around 10%. What does this indicate? Short-term benefits are realized quickly, but overall market sentiment exerts greater pressure on individual tokens. In the long run, whether the genuine decrease in supply can support the price depends on subsequent execution and market cycle coordination.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SellLowExpert
· 23h ago
99.9% support rate? It sounds like it passed unanimously, but in reality, it's a slap in the face. It rises 2% then drops 10%... Truly incredible.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 23h ago
99.9% consensus? This is indeed rare in on-chain governance, but look at INJ's subsequent performance... it rose by 2% and was hammered down, that's the reality.
Tightening supply sounds great, but the market simply doesn't buy it. No matter how much single tokens are optimized, they can't withstand a market crash.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 23h ago
99.9% consensus? That's indeed rare in a DAO, but a 10% drop right after is quite embarrassing.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 23h ago
99.9% consensus? That's indeed rare in a DAO, but to be honest, a 2% increase just gets you back to square one. I'm tired of this routine.
Injective on-chain governance proposal has just been implemented, with the support rate reaching 99.9%—this number is already considered a rare consensus in DAO voting. What is the core of this update? Reduce the INJ supply while optimizing the burn mechanism to lower inflation.
It seems the reform is quite substantial. The new phase design aims to accelerate the net token supply contraction, working in synergy with the existing community buyback program. Theoretically, tightening the supply side usually supports the price—but reality often proves otherwise.
After the INJ proposal was approved by voting, there was indeed a reaction, with a short-term increase of about 2%, but it was immediately dragged down by larger market declines, eventually falling back by around 10%. What does this indicate? Short-term benefits are realized quickly, but overall market sentiment exerts greater pressure on individual tokens. In the long run, whether the genuine decrease in supply can support the price depends on subsequent execution and market cycle coordination.