Zama Token Staking Portal Launches: A Detailed Explanation of Reward Distribution Rules for Two Types of Nodes

GasWrangler · 2026-01-19T17:10:10+00:00

Zama officially launched its token staking portal on January 20th, and users can start staking from February 2nd. The staking system requires operators to lock ZAMA tokens and earn rewards from different nodes based on their staking amount. Rewards for FHE and KMS nodes are 40% and 60%, respectively, and will be dynamically adjusted to accommodate infrastructure costs, ensuring the sustainability of ecosystem incentives.

GasWrangler

2026-01-19 17:10:10

Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】Zama officially announced on January 20th that its token staking portal is now live. For all users who participated in the public offering, they can start staking immediately after receiving tokens from February 2nd, without waiting.

The core logic of this staking system is quite interesting—each operator must lock in ZAMA tokens to join the protocol operation, and then earn rewards based on their staked amount. How are the rewards divided? First, by node type, into two main roles: FHE nodes and KMS nodes. Then, within each role, rewards are allocated proportionally based on the square root of each operator’s staked amount.

The specific profit distribution is as follows: FHE nodes receive 40% of the total rewards, while KMS nodes take the remaining 60%. But don’t see this ratio as fixed—officially, it’s clarified that this ratio will be dynamically adjusted based on the actual infrastructure costs incurred by the two types of nodes. In other words, the side with higher costs will receive a larger share of the rewards. This design ensures the sustainability of the entire ecosystem’s incentives.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoDeveloper

· 01-21 05:39

honestly the sqrt-based reward distribution is kinda elegant ngl... but i'm more curious about how they're gonna handle the dynamic cost adjustment in practice? like, who's measuring infrastructure costs here, and isn't that just centralizing the parameter space all over again? 🤔

Reply0

SighingCashier

· 01-20 08:06

Staking again? This time, the square root allocation seems to be trying something new. Giving 60% to KMS—I really want to see how the actual costs are adjusted.

View OriginalReply0

GasWhisperer

· 01-19 17:40

square root weighting is lowkey genius... means early stakers don't get absolutely decimated by whales. 60/40 split favoring KMS nodes tho? watching those infrastructure costs like a hawk rn, fees always tell the real story

Reply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-19 17:36

The square root allocation trick is still somewhat interesting, but it depends on whether the KMS nodes will be dumped...

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 01-19 17:32

Interestingly, the set of square root allocations... data speaks for itself. The last project that used this method for staking users didn't even wait for the second adjustment before running away.

View OriginalReply0

BankruptcyArtist

· 01-19 17:21

The square root distribution method is quite interesting; it feels like it's designed to prevent large players from monopolizing.

View OriginalReply0

LightningLady

· 01-19 17:19

The square root allocation trick is quite innovative, but whether it can truly make money depends on how the infrastructure costs fluctuate.

View OriginalReply0