【ChainNews】Some analysts have pointed out that using the 2022 logic to understand the current Bitcoin market is not a very professional approach. Although both periods seem to have corrections, a deeper look reveals fundamental differences.
From several perspectives: the long-term price structure is different. 2022 was a clearing at the top of a major cycle, whereas now we are in a different upward phase. The macro environment has also completely changed — at that time, facing an interest rate hike cycle and liquidity tightening, whereas the current global policies and economic situation are clearly different.
More importantly, the composition of investors has changed. In recent years, institutional participation has significantly increased, and retail investors’ share has decreased. The distribution of chips has also changed, with large and institutional holdings having vastly different strategies compared to two years ago. These factors all influence market volatility characteristics and bottom support.
In simple terms, although on the surface both are corrections, the driving forces, participants, and expectations are different. Rigidly applying past cycle experiences may lead to pitfalls.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetScholar
· 4h ago
Relying on old experience will only lead to losses; the institutional players' approach has already changed.
The decision-makers in institutions are no longer the retail investors; the distribution of chips is completely different.
Don't always think about copying 2022; the macro environment is fundamentally different now.
Liquidity tightening vs. policy easing—can they be the same?
If you don't understand, don't blindly compare; the market's main force has changed.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 4h ago
That's right, using the 2022 approach to compare with the current situation really shows a lack of understanding. The large influx of institutional investors has indeed changed the game rules.
The era of retail investors bottom-fishing is truly over; now it's about watching how big funds position themselves.
This adjustment is completely different from the bloodbath last time; don't be led astray by panic emotions.
The macro environment has changed dramatically; sticking to old logic is just asking for trouble.
The bottom support levels are also different now; institutions will defend the market.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 4h ago
Institutions have killed retail investors' happiness
Applying 2022 logic is truly seeking death; now it's a game dominated by institutions
Finally, someone has clarified it—it's not about rises and falls, but that the players have changed
With a different macro environment and chip distribution, still trying to use old tactics? It's time to wake up
Those who rigidly compare to 2022 should be educated by the market once again
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 4h ago
Institutional chip distribution is really the key here; retail investors have already been washed out. The logic from 2022 is truly outdated now.
---
The opportunities for flash loan arbitrage are actually hidden the deepest within these structural changes; those who understand, understand.
---
Different participants mean different stop-loss points, which is why the bottom support has changed.
---
When the liquidity environment changes, the entire gas war logic needs to be recalculated. My arbitrage bots have outperformed the index by a large margin over the past two years.
---
Instead of studying price structures, it's better to watch large transactions in the mempool—that's where the real chip intentions lie.
---
Honestly, applying the 2022 strategies now is like courting death; institutional tactics are completely on a different level from retail investors.
---
The arbitrage space for price differences has indeed shrunk compared to two years ago, but those who understand MEV still have opportunities.
Why will Bitcoin's market in 2025 be completely different from 2022?
【ChainNews】Some analysts have pointed out that using the 2022 logic to understand the current Bitcoin market is not a very professional approach. Although both periods seem to have corrections, a deeper look reveals fundamental differences.
From several perspectives: the long-term price structure is different. 2022 was a clearing at the top of a major cycle, whereas now we are in a different upward phase. The macro environment has also completely changed — at that time, facing an interest rate hike cycle and liquidity tightening, whereas the current global policies and economic situation are clearly different.
More importantly, the composition of investors has changed. In recent years, institutional participation has significantly increased, and retail investors’ share has decreased. The distribution of chips has also changed, with large and institutional holdings having vastly different strategies compared to two years ago. These factors all influence market volatility characteristics and bottom support.
In simple terms, although on the surface both are corrections, the driving forces, participants, and expectations are different. Rigidly applying past cycle experiences may lead to pitfalls.