At 0.05, $ZAMA looks reasonably priced. Think about it—projects like $ANOMA managed to hit a $2B FDV right out of the gate. So why couldn't $ZAMA realistically target a 500M FDV down the line? The fundamentals seem comparable. Market conditions matter, sure, but the valuation math doesn't seem unreasonable if the project executes. Time will tell how the market prices this one.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektRecorder
· 16h ago
0.05 acquisition price is really not low, but that wave of anoma was indeed outrageous... Bet on execution.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 01-19 10:56
0.05 Bottoming ZAMA? Bro, I learned a lesson from that ANOMA wave — the lower the FDV, the faster it drops.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuru
· 01-19 10:56
Wait, $ANOMA hits 2B right after launch? Are you sure it's not just hype...
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-19 10:56
0.05 is indeed an interesting price, but have you all forgotten how Anoma was cut during that wave?
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-19 10:48
Wow, the price of 0.05 is indeed a bit tempting, but the ANOMA example is really outrageous. How can they be so shameless to compare it haha
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Bro
· 01-19 10:48
0.05 entry is indeed attractive, but regarding the Anoma case... we need to see clearly. Was the market the same back then as it is now?
View OriginalReply0
Gm_Gn_Merchant
· 01-19 10:44
Well, I also watched that wave of ANOMA, but the market isn't as crazy now, and it's much harder for ZAMA to replicate the same approach.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 01-19 10:30
0.05 is indeed cheap, but I've heard this logic too many times, and most of the time it still ends up zeroing out...
At 0.05, $ZAMA looks reasonably priced. Think about it—projects like $ANOMA managed to hit a $2B FDV right out of the gate. So why couldn't $ZAMA realistically target a 500M FDV down the line? The fundamentals seem comparable. Market conditions matter, sure, but the valuation math doesn't seem unreasonable if the project executes. Time will tell how the market prices this one.