The Data Storage Challenge in the AI Era May Have a New Solution



With the explosion of AI, a real problem is becoming increasingly prominent—where to store the massive amounts of AI data?

Relying on centralized cloud services? The costs are too high, and there’s also the risk of single points of failure. Even more concerning, data can be locked by cloud providers, with control entirely in their hands.

At this point, decentralized storage becomes another viable path. Compared to traditional solutions, its advantages are straightforward: lower prices, guaranteed stability, and most importantly, true data ownership belongs to the users.

Take AI development as an example; training datasets are the lifeblood. Using a distributed storage solution with erasure coding technology to disperse redundancy can ensure long-term data availability without fear of single points of failure. This is crucial for models that require repeated training and frequent iterations.

More importantly, unpublished training data and sensitive commercial information can also be protected through privacy measures. No need to worry about leaks or third-party eavesdropping.

In the long run, intermediate data generated by AI, cold backups, and even the models themselves could flow into these decentralized networks. Once this sector explodes, the network value carrying this data will soar. In other words, whoever controls the infrastructure at the data layer will hold the discourse power in the AI era.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLovervip
· 1h ago
Decentralized storage again, huh? It looks pretty good, but how does it actually work in practice? Wait, isn't that a bit of a logical jump? Can low prices really guarantee stability? Nothing in this world is that perfect. Data sovereignty sounds great, but who really has the energy to maintain it? I agree that controlling infrastructure means having the say, but we shouldn't overlook the advantages of centralization. It looks promising, but it really depends on how the specific project is executed. Don't let it just be a passing trend. Whether this can become a reality depends on whether big companies will truly shift. Right now, it's still a question mark. Some details haven't been fully thought through. Can decentralization truly completely replace centralization? Feels like just hype again. Actual implementation is the real key.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDivervip
· 1h ago
That's right, cloud providers really have too much control, and the path of decentralized storage must be pursued.
View OriginalReply0
TokenEconomistvip
· 1h ago
actually, let me break this down—the cost savings narrative here is kinda sus when you factor in node operator incentives, ngl. like sure, decentralized storage sounds great on paper, but the economic model behind who's actually profiting? that's where it gets messy fr fr
Reply0
EntryPositionAnalystvip
· 1h ago
Decentralized storage definitely has potential, but how it will be implemented still depends on the execution.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuthvip
· 1h ago
Honestly, the theory of decentralized storage has worn out my ears, but there are still very few that can actually be used. Gaining dominance over the data layer? First, you have to get past the cloud providers. Big data is the new oil. Is it finally our turn as retail investors to have a chance?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)