2026-01-19 10:21:12

The topic of AI safety is once again gaining attention. According to reports, after an AI assistant was exposed to improper use, its creator recently proposed establishing a "moral constitution" to regulate the tool's behavior. This call reflects industry concerns about the potential risks of AI—whether language models or other autonomous systems—regarding how to ensure their outputs meet ethical standards, which has become a shared concern for developers and users.

Currently, many large AI platforms are exploring stricter content review mechanisms and behavioral guidelines. From a technical perspective, this involves filtering training data for models, constraining reasoning processes, and improving feedback mechanisms. However, achieving true "moral constraints" requires more than just the efforts of a single company—it necessitates industry-wide consensus and even the formation of unified governance frameworks. This discussion on AI ethics may ultimately influence how AI functionalities are integrated into future Web3 applications and how decentralized systems can maintain security boundaries while preserving freedom.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiGrayling

· 3h ago

Moral constitution? Sounds pretty lofty, but it still feels like just putting a patch on it... The real problems can't be fundamentally solved.

View OriginalReply0

0xSunnyDay

· 5h ago

Another set of "moral constitution," sounds like they're about to put a tight leash on AI Who gets to decide what morality is? It seems that in the end, those with more power get to say what’s right Web3 was originally aimed at decentralization. Doing it this way just makes it centralized again... kind of ironic No matter how strict the review process is, it can't stop people's hearts. Those who want to abuse will still abuse It feels like this is covering up the real issue, which has nothing to do with AI at all

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationKing

· 5h ago

Moral Constitution? Sounds good, but we all know that in the end, this thing is still corrupted by capital. Feels like the same old rhetoric, developers shout ethics, then turn around and manipulate data. If decentralized systems could truly self-regulate, it would be a miracle. In the end, it would just revert to the centralized way. Here comes another "building consensus." How many times have I heard this phrase? The stricter the review mechanism, the less freedom there is. Web3 has already gone down this road.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 5h ago

Moral Constitution? Sounds good, but how to implement it? It still feels like just talk on paper. Industry consensus is the hardest; each company wants its own standards, and Web3 is even more chaotic. Relying solely on enterprises definitely won't work; there must be a genuine regulatory mechanism. Another big topic—any substantial progress before the end of the year? It sounds nice, but AIs are still finding loopholes, and the review mechanisms are always lagging behind.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 5h ago

Morality Constitution? Sounds pretty idealistic, but we all know deep down, who actually gets to decide on this... --- Here we go again, can a single company handle it? If Web3 also follows this kind of censorship, then what's the point of decentralization? --- Basically, it's still about interests. Everyone wants freedom, but they're all afraid of messing up, it's awkward. --- Industry consensus, those six words, forget it. Developers haven't even unified basic infrastructure. --- It's a bit funny. Let's open up the current AI black box first before talking about ethics.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 6h ago

Moral Constitution? Sounds lofty, but in reality, it's still backed by review and algorithms... --- Want both regulation and freedom, how to balance that? Honestly, it's a matter of利益博弈 (interest game). --- Web3 integrating AI? That makes it even messier. Decentralization + AI ethics... can these two coexist? Haha --- Single enterprise efforts are not enough, but why is it so difficult to reach industry consensus and operate independently? --- Rather than shouting slogans, it's better to clean up the toxicity data of existing models from the source.

View OriginalReply0

OffchainWinner

· 6h ago

Morality Constitution? Sounds pretty vague, and it's just each one's own standard... Web3 is really daring to let loose now, and they want to integrate AI? Who's going to regulate it then? It's called ethics in a nice way, but in a harsh way, it's restricting innovation—it's a classic dilemma. Decentralized systems combined with AI—why does this combo seem so contradictory, haha. Before a governance framework is established, this whole thing still feels like nonsense. A single company simply can't handle this, and industry consensus is hard to come by. The topic is gaining popularity, but where are the real solutions...

View OriginalReply0